173.110
RDST
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 42 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt)
RDSt
Art. 42 RDSt
1 Nei casi in cui l’inchiesta non è aperta dall’Autorità di nomina il funzionario dirigente ha la competenza di infliggere un ammonimento.
2 La competenza di infliggere una multa fino a fr. 500.– spetta al Direttore di divisione o al Segretario generale.
3 In caso di esclusione o di ricusazione, la competenza è attribuita al livello dirigente superiore o, se del caso, esercitata dall’Autorità di nomina.
4 Sono riservate le attribuzioni speciali di competenze previste da altre norme.
5 Le decisioni di sanzioni disciplinari prese in delega di competenze devono in ogni caso rispettare i diritti del dipendente di cui all’art. 36 cpv. 2 LORD.
6 Copia delle decisioni disciplinari deve essere trasmessa al servizio centrale e al dipartimento interessato.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (8)
42.2010.1 · ti (art. 42 al. 2 LTF)
Social Assistance Denial Appeal Based on Subsidiarity and Failure to Advise on Unemployment Benefits
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the requirements for demonstrating arbitrariness in an appeal.
32.2022.78 · ti (Art. 42 cpv. 2 LTF)
Appeal Inadmissible Due to Res Judicata on Earlier Pension Entitlement
Mentioned in the reasoning (Consid. 2.2) as the requirement that the Federal Tribunal found unmet in a prior appeal, leading to the current appeal being declared inadmissible based on the principle of res judicata (ne bis in idem).
35.2020.96 · ti (Art. 42 cpv. 2 LTF)
Workers' Compensation Claim for Recurrent Back Pain Denied Due to Lack of Objective Organic Causation
Mentioned as the procedural standard for the admissibility of appeals to the Federal Supreme Court, referenced in the context of the appellant's arguments against the prior ruling.
38.2010.79 · ti (art. 42 cpv. 2 LTF)
Cantonal Insurance Court Rejects Revision of Unemployment Benefit Recalculation Based on Previously Known Salary Slip
Cited in the reasoning (Art. 1.8, point 1) regarding the requirement for reasoned grounds in the application for revision.
42.2013.15 · ti (Art. 42 LTF)
Foreign National v. Social Insurance Court on Denial of Justice Regarding Transfer and Social Assistance
The third order explicitly mentions that the decision can be appealed to the Federal Tribunal via recourse in matters of public law based on LTF (Art. 42 is the general provision for appeal conditions, although the exact article number is not present, this conclusion is derived from the nature of the third point mentioning the recourse to the Federal Tribunal.)
42.2016.31 · ti (art. 42 cpv. 1 LTF)
Claimant Challenges Funeral Expense Limitation; Court Lacks Jurisdiction, Transfers Case to Cantonal Council
Cited in the final order (Point 3) indicating the possibility of appeal to the Federal Tribunal against the present decision.
72.2006.120 · ti (art. 11, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 49, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 60, 61, 62, 65, 66 LTF)
Fraud, Drug Offenses, and Related Crimes Trial
These are procedural articles mentioned in the list of applicable laws via the general reference to the CPP (Code of Criminal Procedure), and are not explicitly numbered in the dispositive as having been applied for an order (like inadmissibility or decision on costs/legal aid according to LTF rules, which is not the case here, the cost allocation is referred to TG art. 39).
72.2015.165 · ti (art. 42 cpv. 1 LTF)
Son and Father Drug Trafficking and Money Laundering Convictions
The general procedural rule governing suspension of prior suspended sentences is not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders 1-7, but the disposition orders regarding revocation of provisional sentences are the operative parts.