Art. 27 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt)

38.2014.59 · ti (Art. 27 LTF)

Employer Introduction Allowance Denial for Lent IT Professional

Cited in the final order concerning the possibility to appeal the decision to the Federal Tribunal.

36.2012.61 · ti (art. 27 cpv. 2 LTF)

Double Insurance Reimbursement and Enforcement Costs Allocation

This reference is not explicitly present in the dispositive (orders 1-4). The reasoning cites articles from the cantonal law (Legge sull’organizzazione giudiziaria), but the final orders only cite procedural/cost articles relating to the appeal to the Federal Tribunal (TF) or the cantonal court's application of its own law. Article 49 cpv. 2 della Legge sull’organizzazione giudiziaria is cited in order 1 through the internal reference to the cantonal practice/law.

52.2010.269 · ti (art. 27 LTF)

Solar Panels vs. Picturesque Landscape Aesthetic Integrity

Although the text cites 'art. 82 segg. legge sul Tribunale federale [...] LTF' in point 3, the specific reference for the appeal to the Federal Tribunal is usually related to admissibility, but since the question specifically asks for the provisions *actually used in its final orders*, and the list cites 'art. 82 segg. LTF' generally, I will rely on the explicit provision structure.

72.2006.120 · ti (art. 11, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 49, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 60, 61, 62, 65, 66 LTF)

Fraud, Drug Offenses, and Related Crimes Trial

These are procedural articles mentioned in the list of applicable laws via the general reference to the CPP (Code of Criminal Procedure), and are not explicitly numbered in the dispositive as having been applied for an order (like inadmissibility or decision on costs/legal aid according to LTF rules, which is not the case here, the cost allocation is referred to TG art. 39).