Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
173.110 RDST CH-TI

Art. 25 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt)

RDSt
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (77 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 25 RDSt

1 Le assenze programmabili di visite mediche, fisioterapia e simili devono tenere conto delle esigenze di servizio.

2 Chi lavora a tempo parziale deve di regola programmare queste assenze durante il tempo libero.

← Art. 24 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt) Art. 26 RDSt →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (6)

15.2024.92 · ti (art. 25 cpv. 2 lett. c LTF)
Supervisory Authority Decision on Realizing Seized Heir's Interest via Dissolution of Joint Heirship
Cited in the remedies section as the basis for appealing to the Federal Supreme Court regarding the time limit.
9.2013.192 · ti (art. 25 cpv. 2 lett. b n. 6 LTF)
Guardian's Report Approval Upheld Despite Appellant's Claims of Incompleteness and Untimeliness
This seems to be a typo in the original text (likely referring to Art. 72 cpv. 2 lett. b n. 6 LTF, which is listed above) or an uncodified reference; however, based on the structure, it is mentioned in the context of appeal remedies.
60.2013.250 · ti (art. 25 LTF)
Prisoner Transfer Denial Due to Flight Risk
Cited as part of the procedural basis for the decision regarding the appeal (governing recourse to the Federal Tribunal).
14.2013.125 · ti (Art. 25 Abs. 1 BGG)
Debt Enforcement Opposition Withdrawal and Cost Allocation Dispute
Not explicitly found in the dispositive. (Excluded based on strict rule).
72.2006.120 · ti (art. 11, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 37, 38, 39, 40, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 49, 51, 52, 53, 54, 56, 57, 60, 61, 62, 65, 66 LTF)
Fraud, Drug Offenses, and Related Crimes Trial
These are procedural articles mentioned in the list of applicable laws via the general reference to the CPP (Code of Criminal Procedure), and are not explicitly numbered in the dispositive as having been applied for an order (like inadmissibility or decision on costs/legal aid according to LTF rules, which is not the case here, the cost allocation is referred to TG art. 39).
INC.2003.57708 · ti (Art. 25 let. a LTF)
Asset Release Application Following Narcotics Seizure Rejection
This provision is not explicitly mentioned in the dispositive and should be excluded based on strict rules. (Wait, looking closer, Art. 25 LTF is not listed in the explicit decision list, only Art. 161, 284a CPP, 58, 59 CP are mentioned before the decision block. I must stick only to what is explicitly cited *in* the numbered orders (1, 2, 3, 4).)