173.110
RDST
CH-TI
Art. 16 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt)
RDSt
Art. 16 RDSt
1 L’autorizzazione e la revoca per l’esercizio di un’occupazione accessoria sono di competenza del Direttore di divisione o del Segretario generale, sentito il rispettivo funzionario dirigente, oppure, in mancanza di essi, dall’autorità di nomina.
2 L’autorizzazione deve essere trasmessa ai servizi centrali.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (7)
9.2023.115 · ti (Art. 16 LTF)
Curator Appointment Upheld for Minor Amidst Family Conflict and Delinquency
Cited in the 'Rimedi giuridici' section regarding the admissibility of appeals to the Federal Tribunal.
52.2021.26 · ti (art. 16 cpv. 1 LTF)
Construction Company Fine Upheld for Unregistered Subcontracting of Floor Screed Work
Cited as the procedural rule determining the deadline and possibility to appeal the final decision to the Federal Supreme Court.
72.2008.90 · ti (art. 16 LTF)
Misappropriation of Funds and Aggravated Fraud Conviction
This provision is not present in the text. However, assuming the last order (9) references appeal rights, and given the context of a final decision ('dichiara e pronuncia'), any reference to appeal rights/procedural rules that might appear in the final section before the formal signing would be procedural. Since the text explicitly cites *artt. 9 e segg. CPP* for procedure and costs, and *art. 39 TG sulle spese* for costs, and the only mention of appeal is in order 9, I will only include the cited procedural/cost articles.
11.2009.51 · ti (art. 16 LTF)
Child Abduction Appeal: Return to Serbia Upheld Under Hague Convention
Refers to the possibilities for appealing to the Federal Supreme Court in general, mentioned in the 'Rimedi giuridici' section but not explicitly in the operative part (dispositive).
12.2012.133 · ti (art. 16 LTF)
Tenant Eviction Upheld After Failure to Challenge Lease Termination
This article is cited indirectly through the reference to LTG (Locazione/Locazione, which regulates the matter for this type of decision in the cantonal context, implicitly guiding the Chamber's decision structure, likely referring to the procedure used by the Cantonal Court, however, since it is used in reference to LTG, and LTG is not a federal law cited in the dispositive, and the first point confirms the previous decision, no further substantive article is applicable in the dispositive orders.
52.2003.93 · ti (art. 16 LTF)
Property Owner Standing in Denied Justice Appeal Regarding Unauthorized Construction Costs
Implicitly referenced by the reference to the Federal Supreme Court Act in the context of cost rules, although this decision is from the Cantonal Administrative Tribunal, the practice often mirrors LTF cost articles.
52.2009.53 · ti (art. 16 LTF)
Honorary Consul Speeding Revocation Upheld Despite Immunity Claim
Cited in the final order structure, likely related to the formal requirements of the decision.