173.110
RDST
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 12 RDSt Regolamento dei dipendenti dello Stato (RDSt)
RDSt
Art. 12 RDSt
1 Chi occupa un posto a tempo parziale, deve assoggettarsi alla necessità di presenza secondo le esigenze di servizio.
2 Il lavoro ripartito (job sharing) consiste nella divisione complementare e consensuale del medesimo posto di lavoro.
3 In questo caso la ripartizione dell’attività lavorativa così come la presenza alternativa sul posto di lavoro è concordata tra i dipendenti che si dividono i compiti e soggiace all’approvazione del funzionario dirigente.
4 Il cambiamento perdurante e significativo dei piani di presenza deve essere comunicato da parte del funzionario dirigente con preavviso corrispondente almeno al termine di disdetta.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (12)
52.2008.90 · ti (art. 12 LTF)
Brazilian National's Residence Permit Renewal Denial Upheld After Relationship Dissolution
This provision was cited in the dispositive (Order 3) regarding the admissibility of a subsequent appeal to the Federal Tribunal, although it is not the main ground for this specific Cantonal court decision.
30.2007.20 · ti (art. 12 LTF)
Social Insurance Contribution Assessment: Employee vs. Independent Contractor Status
Cited in the context of appeal procedures applicable to the Federal Tribunal.
30.2003.244 · ti (Art. 12 LTF)
Appeal Withdrawal and Striking from Register
Used to formally strike the appeal from the roll following its withdrawal by the appellant (implied procedural basis for the order, consistent with the act of striking the case).
36.2012.50 · ti (Art. 12 LTF)
Claimant v. Health Insurer (Improper Suspension of Benefits)
Cited in the reasoning regarding the inadmissibility of a public law appeal if the matter is not of fundamental legal importance (in connection with Art. 85 LTF).
52.2003.93 · ti (art. 12 LTF)
Property Owner Standing in Denied Justice Appeal Regarding Unauthorized Construction Costs
Implicitly referenced by the reference to the Federal Supreme Court Act in the context of cost rules, although this decision is from the Cantonal Administrative Tribunal, the practice often mirrors LTF cost articles.
72.2008.90 · ti (art. 12 LTF)
Wealth Manager Convicted of Aggravated Misappropriation and Insurance Fraud
Cited in the final orders section (dispositive), referring to the suspension of the custodial sentence.
72.2011.103 · ti (art. 12 LTF)
Swiss Court Sentencing for Aggravated Heroin Trafficking and Fraud
Cited in the list of provisions applied, relating to the general legal framework.
72.2011.103 · ti (art. 12 LTF)
Swiss Court Sentencing for Aggravated Heroin Trafficking and Fraud
Cited in the preamble to the orders as a governing procedural article.
72.2012.41 · ti (Art. 12 LTF)
Switzerland v. Defendant: Drug Trafficking and Impaired Driving Conviction
Cited in the final listing of applicable articles regarding decision clarity/finality, although the decision is a cantonal verdict, this section seems misplaced or refers to potential future appeal grounds (the actual appeal details follow later).
72.2014.130 · ti (art. 12 LTF)
State v. IMPU 1 and IMPU 2 (Drug Offenses)
Cited in the introduction to the operative part, likely referring to the general competence/authority (although this is a criminal court decision, the general reference structure includes procedural laws).
72.2014.145 · ti (art. 12 LTF)
Rip-Deal Fraud and Money Laundering Convictions
Implicitly referenced via '22 TG sulle spese' which is textually cited, though the main operative articles are focused on CP/CPP.
72.2016.84 · ti (art. 12 LTF)
Attempted Assault with a Dangerous Object and Threat; Suspended Sentence Imposed
Cited in the list of applicable provisions, likely related to the competent court/jurisdiction.