165.100
LPAMMVwVG
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 91 LPAmm Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPAmm)
LPAmm
Art. 91 LPAmm
1 Se il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo giudica il licenziamento disciplinare o la disdetta o la mancata conferma ingiustificati, esso lo accerta nella propria sentenza.
2 Secondo la procedura come istanza unica, il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo stabilisce la relativa indennità sia che l’autorità competente non intenda più riassumere il funzionario o egli non intenda più essere riassunto, sia in caso di riassunzione.
3 Se il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo giudica ingiustificata un’altra misura disciplinare, la annulla e può sostituirla con un provvedimento meno grave.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (19)
53.2022.2 · ti (art. 91 LPAmm)
Teacher Unjustified Dismissal Compensation Ruling
This provision regulates the fixing of compensation for unjustified dismissal, which is the core subject of the decision (partially granting the petition based on this article).
52.2019.519 · ti (art. 91 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Teacher Termination Over Relational Conflicts Overturned Due to Insufficient Investigation and Disproportionate Penalty
Cited implicitly via its application in the reasoning (Art. 91 cpv. 1 LPAmm, declared applicable by Art. 66 cpv. 5 LORD) regarding the court's limited power to rule on the justification of the dismissal without ordering reinstatement.
53.2020.2 · ti (art. 91 cpv. 2 LPAmm)
Municipal Employee Compensation for Unjustified Dismissal
This provision establishes the Tribunal's competence to determine the indemnity due in case of unjustified dismissal, which is the core subject of the successful petition.
52.2019.517 · ti (art. 91 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Employee Dismissal Upheld Due to Unauthorized Secret Recording and Breach of Loyalty
Cited to explain that the administrative court can only ascertain unjustified disciplinary dismissal but cannot annul the measure and reinstate employment.
52.2019.377 · ti (art. 91 LPAmm)
Auxiliary Cook Employment Termination and Procedural Irregularity Challenge
The Tribunal limited its ruling to ascertaining the illegitimacy of the dismissal, as required by this procedural article.
52.2018.485 · ti (art. 91 cpv. 2 LPAmm)
Employee Severance Calculation Including Auxiliary Service Overruling State Practice
This procedural rule governed the Tribunal's competence to rule on the claim for compensation due to wrongful dismissal (order 2).
52.2017.149 · ti (Art. 91 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Probationary Dismissal and Right to be Heard Cured by Subsequent Appeal
Cited in the reasoning (consid. 1.2) to explain the inadmissibility of the request to annul the decision and reinstate the employee, although the actual orders only dismiss the appeal.
52.2017.518 · ti (art. 91 LPAmm)
Employee Non-Confirmation Following Outsourcing and Due Process Violation
Cited in order 1 to establish that the Court can only ascertain the unjustified nature of the termination, not annul it and reinstate employment.
52.2017.304 · ti (Art. 91 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Employment Termination Justified by Workplace Misconduct and Performance Issues
This procedural rule was cited to declare inadmissible the appellant's request for annulment leading to reinstatement.
52.2017.289 · ti (Art. 91 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Appeal Against Non-Reconfirmation Following Position Abolition
Cited in the dispositive as the legal basis for rejecting the appeal to the extent it seeks reinstatement of the employment relationship.
52.2015.199 · ti (art. 91 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Employee Non-Confirmation Appeal Dismissed Due to Trust Breakdown
Used to rule on the inadmissibility of the request for annulment of the decision concerning the employer-employee relationship.
52.2017.289 · ti (art. 91 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Municipal Vice-Secretary Reappointment Refusal Upheld Due to Position Suppression
Cited as part of the basis for rejecting the appeal regarding the reinstatement of the employment relationship.
52.2017.304 · ti (Art. 91 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
State Employee Dismissal for Performance and Aggression Upheld
Cited to confirm that the Tribunal must limit itself to recognizing the unjustified dismissal without ordering reinstatement.
52.2017.518 · ti (art. 91 LPAmm)
Employee v. Municipality Regarding Non-Renewal of Contract Due to Procedural Flaw
The court limited its ruling to ascertaining the illegitimacy of the termination because it could not order reinstatement of the employment relationship.
52.2019.377 · ti (art. 91 LPAmm)
Municipality Dismissal of Auxiliary Employee Over Procedural Irregularity
Cited to define the limited scope of the Tribunal's decision regarding unjustifiably dismissed public employment terminations (establishing illegitimacy rather than ordering reinstatement).