165.100 LPAMMVwVG

CH-TI

Art. 66 LPAmm Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPAmm)

LPAmm

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (115 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 66 LPAmm

1 Le decisioni pregiudiziali e incidentali notificate separatamente e concernenti la competenza e le domande di ricusa sono suscettibili di ricorso immediato e non possono più essere impugnate ulteriormente.

2 Le altre decisioni pregiudiziali e incidentali notificate separatamente sono impugnabili a titolo indipendente soltanto se

a) possono provocare al ricorrente un pregiudizio irreparabile, o

b) l’accoglimento del ricorso comporterebbe immediatamente una decisione finale, consentendo di evitare una procedura probatoria defatigante e dispendiosa.

3 Se il ricorso non è ammissibile in virtù del capoverso 2 o non è stato interposto, le decisioni pregiudiziali e incidentali possono essere impugnate mediante ricorso contro la decisione finale in quanto influiscano sul contenuto della stessa.

4 Sono riservate le disposizioni previste da leggi speciali.

← Art. 65 LPAmm Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPAmm) Art. 67 LPAmm →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (86)

9.2024.96 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 lett. a) LPAmm)

Protection Authority Decision on Child Supervision Challenged Due to Hair Testing and Visitation Restrictions

Cited in the reasoning regarding the conditions for appealing incidental decisions due to irreparable prejudice.

9.2024.96 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 lett. b LPAmm)

Protection Authority Decision on Child Supervision Challenged Due to Hair Testing and Visitation Restrictions

Cited in the reasoning regarding the conditions for appealing incidental decisions when the appeal would immediately lead to a final decision.

35.2024.15 · ti (Art. 66 cpv. 2 lett. a LPAmm/TI)

Accident Insurance Objection Suspension Pending Criminal Proceedings Overturned

Mentioned in the reasoning as an equivalent to Art. 46 cpv. 1 lett. a PA regarding the requirements for appealing incidental decisions, but not used in the dispositive.

35.2024.15 · ti (Art. 66 cpv. 2 lett. b LPAmm/TI)

Accident Insurance Objection Suspension Pending Criminal Proceedings Overturned

Mentioned in the reasoning as an equivalent to Art. 46 cpv. 1 lett. b PA regarding the requirements for appealing incidental decisions, but not used in the dispositive.

52.2023.254 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 LPAmm)

Paving and Recycling Plant Permits Versus Unfulfilled Demolition Orders

Cited extensively in the reasoning (Considerand 2.2, 2.3.2) as the legal basis for assessing the admissibility of the appeal concerning the recycling center (which was declared inadmissible).

9.2023.71 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 lett. a) LPAmm)

Appeal Against Proportionality of Immediate Medical Summons Based on Financial Report

This provision was used to determine that the incidental decision could be appealed because it caused irreparable prejudice to the appellant, justifying entry into the merits.

9.2023.149 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 lett. a) LPAmm)

Appeal Against Mandatory Psychiatric Evaluation for Guardianship Continuation

This article defines the conditions for appealing interlocutory decisions (irreparable prejudice), which the court analyzed to assess the admissibility of the appeal.

9.2023.149 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 lett. b LPAmm)

Appeal Against Mandatory Psychiatric Evaluation for Guardianship Continuation

This article defines the conditions for appealing interlocutory decisions independently (if it leads to an immediate final decision), which the court analyzed to assess the admissibility of the appeal.

9.2023.133 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 lett. a) LPAmm)

Appeal Regarding Parental Capacity Evaluation Order Upheld

Cited in the reasoning to define the conditions under which an incidental decision is contestable due to irreparable prejudice, a condition discussed in relation to admissibility.

9.2023.133 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 lett. b LPAmm)

Appeal Regarding Parental Capacity Evaluation Order Upheld

Cited in the reasoning to define the conditions under which an incidental decision is contestable to immediately conclude the procedure, a condition discussed in relation to admissibility.

52.2023.305 · ti (Art. 66 cpv. 2 LPAmm)

Appeal Dismissed Regarding Inadmissibility of Challenge to Municipal Order on Extended Storage Activities

The appeal was dismissed because the conditions for appealing an incidental decision set out in this article were not met (neither a) nor b).

9.2023.7 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 lett. a) LPAmm)

Protection Authority Decision Appeal Regarding Curatorship and Psychiatric Evaluation

Cited in the reasoning regarding the condition for appealing incidental decisions (irreparable prejudice), relevant to the second appeal.

9.2023.7 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 lett. b LPAmm)

Protection Authority Decision Appeal Regarding Curatorship and Psychiatric Evaluation

Cited in the reasoning regarding the condition for appealing incidental decisions (immediate final decision), relevant to the second appeal.

52.2022.357 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 LPAmm)

Municipal Zoning Denial Upheld in Property Conversion Dispute

Used to establish the admissibility of the appeal against the interlocutory decision of the State Council.

52.2022.258 · ti (art. 66 cpv. 2 LPAmm)

Appeal Against Municipal Order Remanded for Lack of Reasoning on Right to Be Heard

The court implicitly relies on the criteria of this article when remanding the case to the lower authority to properly assess the admissibility requirements for the appeal against the procedural order.