165.100
LPAMMVwVG
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 63 LPAmm Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPAmm)
LPAmm
Art. 63 LPAmm
1 La domanda intesa ad accertare l’esistenza, l’inesistenza o l’estensione di diritti od obblighi può essere proposta all’autorità di prima istanza competente nel merito da chi giustifichi un interesse degno di protezione. In particolare, l’istanza può concernere l’accertamento della nullità di un atto amministrativo.
2 La decisione di accertamento è impugnabile con i rimedi ordinari di diritto.
3 Nessun pregiudizio può derivare alla parte che abbia agito fondandosi legittimamente su una decisione di accertamento.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (13)
90.2011.58 · ti (art. 63 cpv. 2 LPamm)
Administrative Court Upholds Zoning Change from Non-Wooded to Agricultural Zone
Used to declare the challenge regarding the dry-stone walls inadmissible because it was raised for the first time before the Tribunal.
52.2011.187 · ti (art. 63 cpv. 2 LPamm)
Appeal Against Municipal Waste Fee Differentiation and Inadequate State Council Review
Used to deem inadmissible the part of the appeal concerning the rectification of the 2010 waste tax, as it constituted a new claim inadmissible in the administrative appeal.
52.2010.394 · ti (art. 63 cpv. 2 LPamm)
Administrative Court Upholds Municipal Agreement for Railway Trench Development Planning
Cited in the reasoning section (1.2) to confirm that the appeal does not constitute a new claim forbidden by procedure.
90.2007.88 · ti (art. 63 cpv. 2 legge di procedura per le cause amministrative del 19 aprile 1966; LPAmm)
Cantonal Zoning Revision Upheld Against Property Rights Challenge
Cited to declare part of the appeal inadmissible as a new claim.
90.2007.113 · ti (art. 63 cpv. 2 legge di procedura per le cause amministrative del 19 aprile 1966; LPAmm)
Land Use Plan Revision Challenge Regarding Pedestrian Path and Road Classification
Cited to declare certain claims made in the appeal inadmissible as new claims.
90.2007.114 · ti (art. 63 cpv. 2 legge di procedura per le cause amministrative del 19 aprile 1966; LPAmm)
Property Owner Appeal of Municipal Development Plan Revision and Zoning Classification
Cited as the legal basis for declaring a part of the appeal inadmissible because it introduced new claims not previously submitted to the previous authority (Consiglio di Stato).
90.2007.49 · ti (art. 63 LPamm)
Property Owner Appeal of Zoning Revision and Cultural Asset Classification
Cited in reasoning to confirm the appellant could not introduce new requests in the appeal phase (point 1.2).
11.2003.26 · ti (art. 63 cpv. 2 LPAmm per analogia)
Foundation Supervision Appeal Involving Surface Rights Over Renovated Buildings
Cited to justify the inadmissibility of new claims introduced in the appeal.
52.2015.361 · ti (art. 63 LPAmm)
Municipality's Tender Cancellation After Award Annulment
Cited in the reasoning regarding the inadmissibility of the request for a declaratory judgment.
52.2019.322 · ti (Art. 63 LPAmm)
Appeal Inadmissible in Teacher Recruitment Dispute Against DECS
Cited in the reasoning regarding the admissibility of the declaratory claim, but not explicitly in operative points 1-4.
90.2007.114 · ti (art. 63 cpv. 2 LPAmm)
Property Owner v. Canton on Zoning and Public Road Reclassification
This procedural provision renders a new claim regarding traffic regulation inadmissible.
90.2007.49 · ti (art. 63 LPamm)
Property Zone Designation Upheld, Cultural Asset Classification Annulled for Lack of Justification
Cited in the reasoning regarding the constraint that new claims cannot be made on appeal by the appellant, specifically concerning the partial building entitlement request.
90.2011.49 · ti (Art. 63 cpv. 2 LPamm)
Gambarogno Master Plan Approval Upheld with Modification to Secondary Residence Conversion Rule
Used to declare the primary request of RI 7 inadmissible because it was a new claim not presented to the State Council.