165.100
LPAMMVwVG
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 62 LPAmm Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPAmm)
LPAmm
Art. 62 LPAmm
1 Se il dispositivo di una decisione è poco chiaro, ambiguo o incompleto oppure in contraddizione con i considerandi, l’autorità, su richiesta scritta di una delle parti, lo interpreta o lo rettifica. Nella domanda devono essere indicati i punti contestati e le modifiche auspicate.
2 L’articolo 59 capoversi 2-4 e l’articolo 60 sono applicabili per analogia.
3 La decisione interpretata o rettificata è impugnabile con i rimedi ordinari di diritto se non emana da un’autorità cantonale d’ultima istanza.
4 L’autorità può correggere in ogni momento gli errori di scrittura o di calcolo o altri errori di svista, che non hanno alcun influsso sul dispositivo né sul contenuto essenziale della motivazione.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (15)
43.2018.1 · ti (art. 62 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Victim Compensation Claim Denial Upheld Due to Insufficient Injury Severity Established in Criminal Proceedings
This provision governed the inapplicability of the rectification request regarding the reasoning of the contested decision, leading to the dismissal of the appeal against the decision based on this article.
35.2015.82 · ti (art. 62 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Insured Party v. Insurer: Interpretation of Family Allowance Inclusion in Daily Benefit Calculation
The court treated the insured's request as a request for interpretation based on the provisions governing interpretation procedures.
35.2015.82 · ti (art. 62 cpv. 4 LPAmm)
Insured Party v. Insurer: Interpretation of Family Allowance Inclusion in Daily Benefit Calculation
Cited regarding the authority's power to correct clerical or calculation errors without influencing the operative part.
38.2015.26 · ti (Art. 62 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Claimant v. Insolvency Benefits Administrator (Rectification of Judgment Refusal)
This article provides the basis for interpreting or rectifying a decision's operative part upon request, but the court ultimately rejected the request because it concerned the grounds, not the operative part.
38.2015.26 · ti (Art. 62 cpv. 4 LPAmm)
Claimant v. Insolvency Benefits Administrator (Rectification of Judgment Refusal)
The court considered the possibility of applying this article regarding the correction of clerical errors but rejected the request on those grounds as well.
38.2015.27 · ti (Art. 62 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Insured Seeks Rectification of Insolvency Ruling Based on Prior Counsel's Inaction
This provision establishes the grounds for interpreting or rectifying a decision's operative part upon request, but the request was rejected because it targeted the reasoning, not the operative part.
38.2015.27 · ti (Art. 62 cpv. 4 LPAmm)
Insured Seeks Rectification of Insolvency Ruling Based on Prior Counsel's Inaction
This provision concerns the correction of clerical or calculation errors, which the court found not applicable to the request.
52.2012.70 · ti (art. 62 LPamm)
Administrative Court Upholds Definitive License Revocation Based on Repeat Offense and Statutory Minimum Period
Cited to confirm the court's power to review whether the facts were accurately and completely established by the lower authorities.
35.2015.82 · ti (Art. 62 LPAmm)
Interpretation of Daily Benefit Calculation Including Family Allowances Post-Work Accident
The central provision regulating the interpretation of unclear or incomplete decisions, which the Tribunal explicitly applied by granting the request in point 1 of the orders.
38.2015.26 · ti (Art. 62 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Insured's Failure to Mitigate Damages Not Subject to Judgment Rectification
Used to declare the request for rectification inadmissible because it concerned the reasoning and not the operative part (dispositivo) of the previous decision.
38.2015.26 · ti (Art. 62 cpv. 4 LPAmm)
Insured's Failure to Mitigate Damages Not Subject to Judgment Rectification
Used to reject the request, interpreting it as a request for correction of errors, which was found not to apply as the matter was not a simple writing or calculation error.
38.2015.27 · ti (Art. 62 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Claimant Seeks Rectification of Social Insurance Court Decision on Insolvency Benefits Denial
This article governed the interpretation and rectification of a decision, which was the subject of the rejected request.
38.2015.27 · ti (Art. 62 cpv. 4 LPAmm)
Claimant Seeks Rectification of Social Insurance Court Decision on Insolvency Benefits Denial
Cited in connection with the rejection of the request as a correction of writing or calculation error, being applicable via Art. 31 Lptca.
43.2018.1 · ti (Art. 62 LPAmm)
Victim Assistance Claim Denial Affirmed for Minor Assault Injuries
Cited as the legal basis for declaring the claim for rectification (appeal against the decision of August 24, 2018) inadmissible because it concerned the reasoning rather than the operative part of the decision.
90.2015.15 · ti (art. 62 cpv. 4 LPAmm)
Environmental Organizations v. Cantonal Council Zoning Plan Approval for Wind Farm Near Protected Site
Cited in the subsequent correction order as the legal basis allowing the Tribunal to correct a clerical error regarding the prepaid court fee amount.