165.100 LPAMMVwVG

CH-TI

Art. 56 LPAmm Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPAmm)

LPAmm

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (115 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 56 LPAmm

1 L’autorità amministrativa esegue le proprie decisioni.

2 L’esecuzione delle decisioni dell’autorità di ricorso è devoluta alla istanza che ha preso il provvedimento impugnato.

3 L’esecuzione forzata avviene

a) trattandosi di pagamento di una somma di denaro o di prestazione di garanzie, nelle forme della legge federale sulla esecuzione e sul fallimento dell’11 aprile 1889;

b) mediante esecuzione d’ufficio a spese dell’obbligato;

c) mediante coercizione diretta nei confronti dell’obbligato; a tale scopo può essere chiesto l’intervento della polizia comunale e, in via sussidiaria, della polizia cantonale.

4 Restano riservate le sanzioni del Codice penale per disobbedienza a decisione dell’autorità.

5 L’esecuzione d’ufficio e l’impiego della forza devono essere preceduti, salvo casi urgenti, da una diffida inappellabile ad adempiere entro breve termine.

6 La decisione di esecuzione è impugnabile con i rimedi ordinari di diritto.

← Art. 55 LPAmm Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPAmm) Art. 57 LPAmm →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (12)

52.2023.212 · ti (Art. 56 cpv. 3 lett. a LPAmm)

Employee v. State Council: Inadmissibility of Appeal for Enforcement of Pecuniary Claim

Cited as the procedural rule governing forced execution for monetary claims, leading to the declaration of inadmissibility due to the wrong forum.

52.2020.78 · ti (art. 56 cpv. 1 LPAmm)

Appellant v. Municipality Regarding Forced Demolition of Unauthorized Retaining Wall

Cited in reasoning 2.1 regarding the administrative authority's power to enforce its decisions through official execution (though not repeated in the dispositive).

52.2020.78 · ti (art. 56 cpv. 5 LPAmm)

Appellant v. Municipality Regarding Forced Demolition of Unauthorized Retaining Wall

Cited in reasoning 2.1 regarding the requirement of an unappealable notice to comply before forced execution (though not repeated in the dispositive).

52.2013.169 · ti (art. 56 LPamm)

Building Permit Annulment Due to Landscape Integration and Primary Residence Mandate

Cited to establish the State Council's full power of review when acting as the appellate authority, which it failed to exercise regarding the motivation for landscape integration (Order 4, reasoning 4.6).

52.2011.223 · ti (art. 56 LPamm)

Probationary Driving License Revocation Upheld After Multiple Serious Traffic Offenses

Cited in the reasoning section to affirm the appellate authority's full power to review the facts and law of the challenged decision.

52.2009.66 · ti (Art. 56 LPamm)

Appeal Against Building Permit Denial for Volume Increase in Village Core

Cited in the preamble, this provision defining the scope of judicial review was mentioned in the context of the limits of the court's review over municipal discretionary power, although the appeal was ultimately rejected.

52.2008.193 · ti (art. 56 LPamm)

Farmhouse Conversion Permit Denial Overturned Due to Misapplication of Agricultural Labor Unit Threshold

Cited in the formal decision structure, relating to the obligation to establish the facts during proceedings.

52.1996.44 · ti (art. 56 LPAmm)

Landlord Fines for Failure to Report New Tenants

This procedural rule regarding costs was cited in the preamble to the decision.

52.2008.193 · ti (art. 56 LPamm)

Farmer's Building Permit Based on Evolving Farm Status and Legal Interpretation

Cited in the 'visti' section, relating to verifying factual findings and applying the law.

52.2009.66 · ti (art. 56 LPamm)

Cantonal Court Upholds Denial of Building Permit Due to Volume and Typological Inconsistency

Cited in the list of provisions considered, even though the text of the dispositive itself only cites procedural rules for appeal/costs. This article governs the scope of review, which was heavily discussed and determined the outcome.

52.2013.169 · ti (art. 56 LPamm)

Ronco s. Ascona Building Permit Challenge Regarding Primary Residence Requirements and Aesthetic Integration

Cited in the reasoning to establish that the Government, acting as an appeal authority, has full cognitive power, which is relevant to the rejection of the landscape integration argument.

52.2023.212 · ti (art. 56 cpv. 3 lett. a LPAmm)

Cantonal Parliament Employee Salary Classification Dispute

This provision establishes that the enforcement of monetary payments is to be carried out according to the forms of the Federal Law on Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy (LEF), which is the substantive basis for declining jurisdiction in favor of the executive authority for monetary claims.