Art. 34 LPAmm Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPAmm)

9.2024.59 · ti (art. 34 e seg. LPAmm)

Mother's Appeal Regarding Child Visitation Modification Rejected

Cited in the reasoning concerning the right to be heard, but not explicitly in the dispositive orders (only in the legal considerations).

52.2023.146 · ti (art. 34 LPAmm)

Police Vice-Commander Termination and Suspension Challenge

Cited in conjunction with Art. 134 para. 4 LOC regarding the violation of the right to be heard.

9.2021.34 · ti (art. 34 ss LPAmm)

Mother's Appeal Granted Over Procedural Violations in Parental Authority Dispute

Cited in the reasoning when discussing the codification of the right to be heard in the LPAmm.

52.2020.21 · ti (Art. 34 LPAmm)

Physician Disciplinary Fine Appeal: Misleading Use of "Professor" Title

Cited in relation to the right to be heard and the requirement for grounds/motivation, which the lower court failed to meet.

90.2017.12 · ti (art. 34 LPAmm)

State Council Resolution Annulled Over Violation of Property Owner's Right to Be Heard in Zoning Dispute

Cited in the reasoning to establish the right to be heard, which forms the main basis for partially accepting the appeal and annulling the decision.

90.2017.13 · ti (art. 34 LPAmm)

Municipality v. State Council: Zoning Revision, Right to Be Heard, and Energy Standards Compliance

Although cited in the reasoning regarding the right to be heard, this provision was not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders 1 or 2 regarding the merits or procedure.

90.2017.18 · ti (art. 34 LPAmm)

Owners v. State Council (Right to be Heard Violation in Zoning Refusal)

Violation of this procedural rule regarding the right to be heard led to the partial acceptance of the appeal and the quashing of the decision.

90.2018.27 · ti (art. 34 segg. LPAmm)

Appeal Regarding Inadmissibility of Challenge to Zoning Plan Initiation

Cited in the reasoning section (consid. 2.1) regarding the violation of the right to be heard under the Administrative Procedure Law, which was a key consideration in the overall ruling.

52.2018.216 · ti (art. 34 LPAmm)

Revocation of State Representative Appointment and Procedural Review

Cited as the cantonal procedural basis establishing the right of the parties to be heard.

90.2014.39 · ti (art. 34 LPAmm)

Property Owners v. State Council (Zoning Plan Amendments)

Cited as the basis for the right to be heard, which is relevant to the reasoning regarding motivation (though the court ultimately waived a full review).

9.2013.88 · ti (art. 34 cpv. 3 c) LPamm)

Curatorship Transition Under New Protection Law Requires Re-evaluation

Cited in the facts (Section D) as the basis for ordering the compelled appearance of RE 1, but this is not in the dispositive.

10.2004.97.2 · ti (Art. 34 LPamm)

Expropriation Cost Apportionment Following Impossible Agreement Term

Cited regarding the use of forced execution measures.

10.2004.97.2 · ti (Art. 34 cpv. 3 primo comma LPamm)

Expropriation Cost Apportionment Following Impossible Agreement Term

Cited regarding the execution procedure for monetary sums.

10.2004.97.2 · ti (art. 34 LPamm)

Expropriation Cost Apportionment Following Impossible Agreement Term

Cited as the basis for the Tribunal to use forced execution procedures for its decisions.

10.2004.97.2 · ti (art. 34 cpv. 3 primo comma LPamm)

Expropriation Cost Apportionment Following Impossible Agreement Term

Cited to indicate that execution of a monetary sum follows the Federal Law on Debt Enforcement and Bankruptcy.