165.100
LPAMMVwVG
CH-TI
CH-TI
Art. 33 LPAmm Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPAmm)
LPAmm
Art. 33 LPAmm
1 Il diritto di esaminare gli atti può essere negato soltanto a protezione di legittimi interessi pubblici o privati o di un’istruttoria in corso. Il rifiuto deve essere motivato e annotato agli atti.
2 L’atto il cui esame è stato negato a una parte può essere adoperato contro di essa soltanto se l’autorità gliene ha comunicato oralmente o per iscritto il contenuto essenziale e le ha dato inoltre la possibilità di pronunciarsi e di indicare prove contrarie.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (10)
52.2024.302 · ti (art. 33 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Appointment Annulled Due to Insufficient Verification of Required Experience in Job-Sharing Section Head Role
Cited in the reasoning section to define the exceptions allowing denial of access to case files, which relates to the procedural arguments addressed.
52.2024.302 · ti (art. 33 cpv. 2 LPAmm)
Appointment Annulled Due to Insufficient Verification of Required Experience in Job-Sharing Section Head Role
Cited in the reasoning section concerning the consequences if access to documents is denied, a procedural point discussed in the decision.
52.2024.308 · ti (art. 33 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Appeal Against Cantonal Gallery Director Appointment Due to Flawed Qualification Verification
Cited in the reasoning regarding the denial of the right to examine the file, but not explicitly in the final orders (1-4).
52.2024.308 · ti (art. 33 cpv. 2 LPAmm)
Appeal Against Cantonal Gallery Director Appointment Due to Flawed Qualification Verification
Cited in the reasoning regarding the consequences of denying file access, but not explicitly in the final orders (1-4).
52.2020.322 · ti (art. 33 cpv. 2 LPAmm)
Attorneys Sanctioned for Improper Solicitation Over Unshared Evidence
Referenced in the reasoning for the remittance, indicating the legal standard for using evidence against a party whose access was denied, justifying the procedural annulment.
52.2020.322 · ti (art. 33 cpv.1 LPAmm)
Attorneys Sanctioned for Improper Solicitation Over Unshared Evidence
Referenced in the reasoning for the remittance, indicating the legal standard for denying access to records, which justifies the procedural annulment.
52.2018.28 · ti (art. 33 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Employee Salary Reclassification Appeal Due to Lack of Motivation and Document Access
Cited in the reasoning regarding limitations on the right to inspect files.
52.2018.28 · ti (art. 33 cpv. 2 LPAmm)
Employee Salary Reclassification Appeal Due to Lack of Motivation and Document Access
Cited in the reasoning regarding the conditions for using documents withheld from inspection.
52.2018.28 · ti (art. 33 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Civil Servant Salary Classification Challenge: Right to be Heard Upheld, Accrued Salary Increase Denied
Cited in the reasoning regarding limitations on the right to review case files.
52.2018.28 · ti (art. 33 cpv. 2 LPAmm)
Civil Servant Salary Classification Challenge: Right to be Heard Upheld, Accrued Salary Increase Denied
Cited in the reasoning concerning the application of unreviewed documents against a party.