165.100
LPAMMVwVG
CH-TI
Art. 26 LPAmm Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPAmm)
LPAmm
Art. 26 LPAmm
1 Le parti sono tenute a cooperare all’accertamento dei fatti
a) in un procedimento da esse proposto;
b) in un altro procedimento, se propongono domande indipendenti;
c) in quanto un’altra legge speciale imponga loro obblighi più estesi di informazione o di rivelazione.
2 L’obbligo di cooperazione non comprende la consegna di oggetti e documenti inerenti ai contratti tra una parte e il suo avvocato autorizzato a esercitare la rappresentanza in giudizio in Svizzera secondo la legge federale del 23 giugno 2000 sugli avvocati.
3 L’autorità può dichiarare inammissibili le domande formulate nei procedimenti menzionati alle lettere a) e b) del primo capoverso, qualora le parti neghino la cooperazione necessaria e ragionevolmente esigibile.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (91)
52.2021.432 · ti (art. 26 cpv. 1 lett. a e 3 LPAmm)
Building Permit Annulled for Inadequate Ventilation Documentation
Cited in the reasoning section (consid. 4.4) leading to the decision to annul the license due to insufficient information regarding the ventilation system, indicating procedural grounds used implicitly in the decision to remit the case.
52.2021.302 · ti (art. 26 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Vineyard Owners v. State: Wildlife Capture Authorization and Fencing Feasibility
Cited in relation to the parties' duty to collaborate during the necessary fact-finding process upon remittal.
52.2021.302 · ti (art. 26 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Vineyard Owners v. State: Wildlife Capture Authorization and Fencing Feasibility
Cited regarding the duty of the parties to cooperate in gathering facts for the required investigation.
52.2019.307 · ti (art. 26 LPAmm)
Collective License Revocation Upheld Due to Failure to Meet Minimum Sales Quota
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the appellant's failure to fulfill their duty to collaborate in establishing the facts.
52.2013.169 · ti (art. 26 cpv. 1 LPamm)
Building Permit Annulment Due to Landscape Integration and Primary Residence Mandate
Cited to explain the requirement for written reasoning, the violation of which led to the annulment of the State Council's decision concerning landscape integration (Order 4, reasoning 4.8).
52.2014.47 · ti (art. 26 cpv. 1 LPamm)
Wage Violation Fine Reduction for Employer
Cited in the reasoning regarding the duty to motivate decisions, part of the rejected claim regarding the right to be heard.
52.2014.43 · ti (art. 26 LPamm)
Public Contract Award Challenge Regarding Unlisted Medicine Supply Limits
Cited in the reasoning regarding the general requirement for written motivation of every decision.
52.2013.149 · ti (art. 26 cpv. 1 LPamm)
Residence Permit Revocation Due to Drug Trafficking and Public Order Concerns
Cited in section 2.1 as the cantonal procedural norm that establishes the duty of authorities to provide reasoning for their decisions, linked to the right to be heard.
52.2012.136 · ti (art. 26 LPamm)
State Denial of CAT Scanner Authorization Upheld on Public Need Grounds
The court referenced this article when examining the appellants' claim regarding insufficient grounds for the challenged decision, although it ultimately found the grounds sufficient.
9.2013.160 · ti (Art. 26 LPamm)
Curator Appeal Against Unjustified Reduction in Reimbursement
Cited as the article establishing the principle of written motivation, which was violated by the lower authority.
11.2006.67 · ti (art. 26 cpv. 1 LPAmm)
Curator Fee Remuneration Dispute and Mandatory Separate Accounting
Cited in consideration 5(a) as the provision requiring all decisions by a Regional Tutelage Commission or Supervisory Authority to be reasoned in writing.
52.2012.316 · ti (art. 26 cpv. 1 LPamm)
Land Use Initiative Validity Challenge Regarding Static Constraints on Future Amendments
Cited to describe the general rule regarding the requirement of written justification, a component of the right to be heard.
90.2010.10 · ti (art. 26 cpv. 2 LPamm)
Appeal Regarding Municipal Zoning Plan Revision and Setback Line Removal
Cited implicitly in the reasoning leading to the decision to annul the setback line, regarding the failure to motivate the decision.
52.2011.187 · ti (art. 26 cpv. 1 LPamm)
Appeal Against Municipal Waste Fee Differentiation and Inadequate State Council Review
Cited alongside Art. 29 cpv. 2 Cost. regarding the requirement for authorities to sufficiently motivate their decisions.
52.2011.17 · ti (art. 26 cpv. 1 LPamm)
Company Exclusion from Tenders Over Simple vs. Grave Foreign Nationals Law Violation
Cited as part of the legal basis defining the duty to motivate decisions concerning the right to be heard.