Art. 24 LPAmm Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPAmm)

10.2009.4 · ti (art. 24 LPamm)

Property Owner v. Municipality: Time-Barred Claim for Material Expropriation Compensation Due to Zoning Changes

Cited in the reasoning for the analogy to Civil Procedure Code rules, but not explicitly in the final orders.

90.2008.97 · ti (art. 24 LPamm)

Property Owner v. Canton: Annulment of Zoning Amendment Due to Inadequate Public Participation

Procedural rule cited in the preamble and applied in section 1.1 to confirm the appellant's standing (succession in the administrative procedure).

50.2009.2 · ti (art. 24 LPamm)

Expropriation Claimant Standing on Partial Succession of Claim

Cited in the basis for judgment as the rule providing for the analogical application of CPC provisions in administrative procedure.

10.2004.52 · ti (art. 24 LPamm)

Expropriation Compensation Claimants' Standing After Ownership Consolidation and Assignment

Cited as the provision that refers to the application by analogy of CPC rules concerning succession in the process.

10.2004.91.1 · ti (art. 24 LPamm.)

Landowner Challenge to Lakeside Property Expropriation Success Due to Procedural Defects

Cited as providing the analogy for applying Art. 102 CPC in expropriation cases concerning succession, but not cited in the final orders.

90.2003.69 · ti (art. 102 CPC in relazione con l’art. 24 LPAmm)

Property Owners v. State Council Regarding Zoning Consistency with Highway Plans

Cited in the facts section regarding the substitution of parties due to death, which is relevant context but not directly cited in the final orders. However, since the only explicit procedural ground used in the dispositive is Art. 38 cpv. 4 lett. c LALPT for inadmissibility, only that is strictly included based on the rules.

10.2004.52 · ti (Art. 24 LPamm)

Expropriation Indemnity Claim: Active Legitimation After Property Transfer and Bankruptcy Acquisition

Cited as the basis for referring by analogy to the rules of civil procedure concerning substitution in the process.

10.2004.91 · ti (art. 24 LPamm.)

Municipality Expropriation Annulled Due to Procedural Defects in Land Seizure

Cited in the reasoning regarding procedural links, but not explicitly mentioned in the dispositive, therefore excluded based on strict rule.

10.2010.9 · ti (art. 24 LPamm)

Material Expropriation Due to Rezoning of Buildable Land to Protected Zone

This article was mentioned in the reasoning (point 7) to justify the application of the Code of Civil Procedure (CPC) regarding the transfer of proceedings following alienation.

40.2011.3 · ti (art. 24 LPamm)

Property Owner's Appeal Against Condominium Valuation Dismissed Due to Lack of Litisconsortium

Cited in the reasoning concerning the applicability of CPC due to referrals.

90.2003.69 · ti (art. 102 CPC in relazione con l’art. 24 LPAmm)

Landowners v. Cantonal Government Regarding Industrial Zoning Denial for Road Corridor

Cited in section G of 'Ritenuto in fatto' as the basis for the succession in process, though this reasoning is narrative rather than dispositive (Note: This is a procedural note in the facts section, and strictly speaking, does not appear in the final numbered orders which are the basis for inclusion. However, since the final order does not have any substantive grounds, and this procedural succession was mentioned prominently before the final ruling, it's noted here for completeness if the strict rule is slightly bent for crucial procedural points mentioned right before the operative part. *However, adhering strictly to the instruction 'Include a provision only if it is explicitly cited in the dispositive (the numbered orders at the end of the decision)', this reference is excluded.*)