165.100 LPAMMVwVG

CH-TI

Art. 11 LPAmm Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPAmm)

LPAmm

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (115 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 11 LPAmm

1 Le parti che presentano conclusioni in un procedimento devono sempre comunicare all’autorità il loro domicilio o la loro sede.

2 Le parti possono anche indicare un recapito elettronico e consentire che le notificazioni siano fatte loro per via elettronica. In questo caso, il Consiglio di Stato può prevedere che le parti forniscano ulteriori indicazioni. [3]

3 Le parti con domicilio o sede all’estero devono designare un recapito in Svizzera. Se non ottemperano a tale incombenza, le notificazioni loro destinate possono avvenire mediante pubblicazione nel Foglio ufficiale.

[3] Cpv. in vigore dal 1.1.2022 - BU 2013, 453 e BU 2021, 342.

← Art. 10 LPAmm Legge sulla procedura amministrativa (LPAmm) Art. 12 LPAmm →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (10)

9.2021.123 · ti (art. 11 cpv. 3 LPAmm)

Appeal Rejected Due to Improper Form; Lower Authority Proceedings Declared Void *Sua Sponte*

Cited in the reasoning regarding the requirement for the respondent abroad to designate a domicile in Switzerland, which is the context for returning the file to the lower authority (Order 2).

52.2018.196 · ti (art. 11 cpv. 3 LPAmm)

Italian Citizen v. Swiss Authority on Service of Process

The case file is sent back to the State Council so that it can request the advance payment again, notifying the decision to the address designated by the appellant in Switzerland.

52.2009.233 · ti (art. 11 LPamm)

Denial of Extended Speech Therapy Coverage Upheld

Cited indirectly through reference to Borghi/Corti commentary regarding the dismissal of the complaint concerning the late submission of a response.

52.2010.86 · ti (art. 11 LPamm)

Municipality v. Property Owner Regarding Chicken Coop Permit Procedure

Cited in the preamble, referencing procedural rules for administrative cases, though the specific application in the dispositive is procedural or relates to the referral.

30.2006.53 · ti (art. 11 LPamm.)

Property Owner's Late Appeal of Torrent Protection Contribution Inadmissible

Cited to confirm that the 30-day deadline set by law is peremptory.

12.2003.118 · ti (art. 11 LPamm)

Sole Proprietorship Deregistration Deadline Extension Appeal Dismissal

This provision on the peremptory nature of statutory deadlines was cited in the reasoning supporting the rejection of the appeal (though not explicitly in the dispositive, it is the main substantive rule justifying the outcome before costs).

11.2004.99 · ti (art. 11 LPAmm)

Supervisory Authority Refusal to Rule on Provisional Measures Regarding Minor in Placement

This provision is mentioned in the reasoning but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.

30.2006.53 · ti (art. 11 LPamm.)

Property Owner v. Municipality (Untimely Appeal of Betterment Contributions)

Cited in the reasoning regarding the peremptory nature of the legal deadline established by law (Art. 13 cpv. 2 LCM).

52.2015.515 · ti (art. 11 cpv. 1 LPAmm)

Neighboring Owners v. Building Permit Modification (Single Access)

Cited as procedural basis for active standing (legittimazione attiva) of the appellants.

9.2021.123 · ti (art. 11 cpv. 3 LPAmm)

Father's Email Custody Submission Inadmissible; Lower Authority Nullified for Improper Electronic Service

Cited in the final dispositive order (No. 2 in the reasoning section, but implicitly applied in the decision's context regarding future procedure) regarding notifying the party without a Swiss domicile, although not explicitly listed in the numbered dispositive orders 1-4, the principle derived from it guides the handling of the return of the file (No. 2).