150.100 LEDP

CH-TI

Art. 133 LEDP Legge sull’esercizio dei diritti politici (LEDP)

LEDP

Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (143 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 133 LEDP

1 Per atti della procedura preparatoria si intendono quelli compiuti fino alla chiusura delle operazioni di voto.

2 Contro ogni atto del Municipio o del Sindaco o di un’istanza subordinata nella procedura preparatoria delle votazioni o elezioni e in materia di iniziativa, referendum o revoca può essere interposto ricorso al Tribunale cantonale amministrativo.

3 Contro ogni atto del Consiglio di Stato o di un’istanza subordinata nella procedura preparatoria delle votazioni o elezioni e in materia di iniziativa, referendum o revoca può essere interposto reclamo al Consiglio di Stato; la decisione su reclamo è definitiva, riservato il diritto federale.

4 Contro la decisione del Consiglio di Stato in materia di ineleggibilità è dato ricorso al Tribunale cantonale amministrativo.

5 Il termine è di tre giorni a decorrere da quello in cui è stato compiuto l’atto che si intende impugnare o dalla scoperta del motivo di impugnazione.

6 Il Tribunale cantonale amministrativo o il Consiglio di Stato, previa sommaria indagine, decreta i provvedimenti d’urgenza, riservato il ricorso secondo l’articolo 134.

← Art. 132 LEDP Legge sull’esercizio dei diritti politici (LEDP) Art. 134 LEDP →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (10)

52.2024.188 · ti (art. 133 cpv. 1 e 2 LEDP)

Challenger v. Municipality Loan Information Objectivity

Cited as the source of the Administrative Tribunal's jurisdiction to rule on the appeal concerning the preparatory procedure.

52.2024.188 · ti (art. 133 cpv. 5 LEDP)

Challenger v. Municipality Loan Information Objectivity

Used to confirm that the appeal was filed within the prescribed time limit.

52.2019.599 · ti (art. 133 cpv. 2 LEDP)

Overseas Voter Timeliness Challenge in State Deputy Run-off Election

Cited in the reasoning to establish the Court's jurisdiction, but the dispositive refers to admissibility and rejection of the appeal, not jurisdiction.

52.2019.599 · ti (art. 133 cpv. 5 LEDP)

Overseas Voter Timeliness Challenge in State Deputy Run-off Election

Cited in the reasoning regarding the appeal deadline, but the dispositive does not explicitly rely on it for the final orders.

52.2019.513 · ti (art. 133 cpv. 2 LEDP)

Political Entity v. Municipality (Polling Station Resolution Appeal Timeliness)

Cited in the reasoning section to establish the court's jurisdiction over the appeal against an act in the preparatory electoral procedure, but not explicitly used in the dispositive orders.

52.2019.513 · ti (art. 133 cpv. 5 LEDP)

Political Entity v. Municipality (Polling Station Resolution Appeal Timeliness)

Cited in the reasoning section regarding the three-day deadline for appeal, which the court ultimately used to declare the appeal time-barred, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders.

52.2019.513 · ti (art. 133 cpv. 2 LEDP)

Electoral Office Organization Challenge Dismissed as Untimely

Cited to confirm the competence of the Cantonal Administrative Court to hear the appeal against the preparatory act (organization of polling stations).

52.2019.513 · ti (art. 133 cpv. 5 LEDP)

Electoral Office Organization Challenge Dismissed as Untimely

Although cited in the reasoning to establish tardiness, it is the substantive procedural basis for the time limits applied to the appeal, which caused the decision to reject the appeal.

52.2019.599 · ti (Art. 133 cpv. 2 LEDP)

Voter Challenge to Parliamentary Election Results Based on Delayed Overseas Ballots

Cited implicitly in the reasoning (1.1.1) to establish the Tribunal's competence to hear the appeal against the preparatory act of sending voting material.

52.2019.599 · ti (Art. 133 cpv. 5 LEDP)

Voter Challenge to Parliamentary Election Results Based on Delayed Overseas Ballots

Cited in the reasoning (1.3.1 and 1.3.3) when assessing the timeliness of the appeal, even though the core finding on timeliness (1.3.2) confirms receptivity despite not citing it in the dispositive.