933.10
GEÖLEP
CH-NE
CH-NE
Art. 50 Loi sur les établissements publics (LEP), du 18 février 2014 - Ordonnances pénales
9 Économie - 93 Industrie et artisanat - 933 Services - Chapitre 10 Dispositions pénales
Art. 50 Loi sur les établissements publics (LEP), du 18 février 2014 · Ordonnances pénales
[23] 1 Le service poursuit et sanctionne les contraventions à la présente loi par voie d'ordonnance pénale, conformément au code de procédure pénale.
2. L'opposition à l'ordonnance pénale doit être adressée au service, qui la traite conformément au code de procédure pénale.
3. Dans les cas de peu de gravité, le service peut renoncer à la poursuite pénale.
Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (11)
CDP.2013.2 · ne (art. 50 al. 1 let. e et f LEP)
License Revocation Upheld for Repeated Disturbances
The court implicitly confirmed the grounds for withdrawal of the patent based on repeated disorders and disturbances to the neighborhood, which fall under these provisions, to reject the appeal.
CDP.2013.2 · ne (art. 50 al. 2 LEP)
License Revocation Upheld for Repeated Disturbances
The court used this article to justify that the prior warning (avertissement) could be taken into consideration to support the final withdrawal measure.
TA.2010.15 · ne (Art. 50 al.1 litt.c LEP)
License Revocation Overturned for Repeated Minor Infractions
Cited as a reason for opening administrative proceedings for withdrawal of the license due to repeated offenses.
TA.2010.15 · ne (Art. 50 al.1 litt.g LEP)
License Revocation Overturned for Repeated Minor Infractions
Cited as a reason for opening administrative proceedings for withdrawal of the license when the holder allows a third party to effectively operate the establishment under their license.
TA.2010.15 · ne (Art. 50 al.2 LEP)
License Revocation Overturned for Repeated Minor Infractions
Cited as a basis for requiring an warning before withdrawing a license, except in serious cases.
TA.2010.15 · ne (Art. 50 al.3 LEP)
License Revocation Overturned for Repeated Minor Infractions
Cited as grounds for withdrawing a license if the cause is attributable to the owner of the commercial property or building.
TA.2003.239 · ne (Art. 50 al.1 litt.c LEP)
Hotel Operator License Revocation Reduced to Suspension for Illegal Employment
The court partially admitted the appeal and modified the decision by pronouncing a temporary withdrawal of the patent based on this article concerning serious or repeated infringements.
TA.2004.147 · ne (art.50 al.1 litt.c LEP)
Café Operator Patent Withdrawal Reduced Due to Disproportionate Penalty
The initial decision was based on this article to pronounce the definitive withdrawal of the patent.
TA.2004.147 · ne (art.50 al.2 LEP)
Café Operator Patent Withdrawal Reduced Due to Disproportionate Penalty
This article was used to justify the prior warning and the subsequent withdrawal based on repeated offenses.
TA.1997.32 · ne (Art. 50 al.2 LEP)
Proprietor License Withdrawal Appeal for Drug Trafficking at Establishment
The court upheld the administrative warning issued under this provision, implicitly confirming its application as the basis for the measure taken.
TA.1995.55 · ne (art.50 al.1 litt.c, e, f LEP)
Nightclub License Revocation Upheld Due to Persistent Infractions
This provision outlines the conditions under which a license can be withdrawn, which forms the substantive basis for rejecting the appeal against the license withdrawal.