Legislator Jurisprudence & Législation
DE FR IT EN
Analyser dans Legislator
842.1.1 KVGGLALAMAL CH-FR

Art. 24 Loi d'application de la loi fédérale sur l'assurance-maladie (LALAMal) - Décision de la Caisse AVS

Voies de droit
Ouvrir la source officielle Texte complet (38 Articles) Version Markdown lisible par machine (.md)

Art. 24 LALAMal · Décision de la Caisse AVS

1. Les intéressés peuvent former réclamation auprès de la Caisse AVS contre ses décisions, dans les trente jours dès leur communication. La réclamation est écrite; elle est brièvement motivée et contient les conclusions du réclamant.

2. Les décisions sur réclamation sont sujettes à recours au Tribunal cantonal.

← Art. 23 LALAMal Loi d'application de la loi fédérale sur l'assurance-maladie (LALAMal) - Objet et champ d'application Art. 26 LALAMal →

Vous souhaitez savoir comment cette disposition s'applique à votre dossier ?

Analysez ce texte législatif avec la jurisprudence, la doctrine et les dispositions connexes dans Legislator AI.

Ouvrir dans Legislator →

Décisions judiciaires appliquant cette disposition (10)

608 2025 17 · fr (art. 24 al. 1 de la loi fribourgeoise du 24 novembre 1995 d'application de la loi fédérale sur l'assurance-maladie (LALAMal; RSF 842.1.1))
Couple Denied Appeal on Late Reconsideration of Health Insurance Premium Reduction
Cited in the reasoning when discussing the formal requirements for the administrative appeal (réclamation).
608 2019 43 · fr (Art. 24 Abs. 2 des Ausführungsgesetzes vom 24. November 1995 zum Bundesgesetz über die Krankenversicherung (KVGG; SGF 842.1.1))
Appeal Against Denial of Health Insurance Premium Reduction Based on Outdated Income Data
Cited in connection with Art. 1 para. 2 lit. c KVG to establish the jurisdiction of the Cantonal Court over appeal decisions regarding premium reductions.
608 2018 293 · fr (Art. 24 Abs. 2 KVGG)
Appeal Dismissed for Untimely Health Insurance Premium Subsidy Application
This provision establishes the admissibility of the appeal to the Cantonal Court against the decision of the compensation office regarding premium reductions.
608 2018 285 · fr (Art. 24 Abs. 2 KVGG)
Claimant v. Insurer (Remand for Re-evaluation of Premium Reduction Based on Updated Income Data)
Cited in the reasoning as the legal basis for challenging premium reduction decisions, setting the context for jurisdiction, but not explicitly cited in the dispositive orders I-III.
608 2016 146 · fr (Art. 24 Abs. 2 KVGG)
Equalization Fund Premium Reduction Appeal: Tax Assessment Basis for Recent Movers
Cited in the reasoning section as the basis for the admissibility of the appeal against the decision of the cantonal equalization office.
608 2015 161 · fr (Art. 24 Abs. 2 KVGG)
Spousal Income Calculation for Health Insurance Premium Reduction Denial
Cited in conjunction with Art. 1 Abs. 2 lit. c KVG as the basis for the court's jurisdiction over the appeal.
608 2015 58 · fr (Art. 24 Abs. 2 KVGG)
Health Insurance Premium Reduction Calculation Based on Prior Year's Income
Procedural basis specifying the Cantonal Court's jurisdiction to hear appeals against decisions on premium reductions.
608 2014 196 · fr (Art. 24 al. 1 de la loi cantonale d'application de la loi fédérale sur l'assurance-maladie du 24 novembre 1995 (LALAMal; RSF 842.1.1.1))
Appeal on Late Health Insurance Premium Reduction Due to Faulty Notification
Although the appeal was rejected on the merits, the court decided exceptionally to consider the claim admissible by referring to the conditions under which the appeal was considered admissible (no proof of notification for the previous decision).
608 2015 10 · fr (Art. 24 Abs. 2 KVGG)
Appeal Against Refusal of Health Insurance Premium Reduction Based on Post-Marriage Income Assessment
Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's jurisdiction over appeals regarding premium reduction in health insurance.
608 2014 75 · fr (Art. 24 Abs. 2 KVGG)
Appeal Dismissed: Health Insurance Premium Reduction Denial Upheld Based on Prior Year's Tax Assessment Income
Cited together with Art. 1 Abs. 2 lit. c KVG to establish the court's jurisdiction to hear appeals against premium reduction decisions in health insurance matters.