340.01
LEP
CH-VD
CH-VD
Art. 38 Legge sull'esecuzione delle condanne penali (LEP) - Decisioni soggette a ricorso [ 2, 5, 7, 8 ]
Titolo IV, Capitolo III
Art. 38 LEP · Decisioni soggette a ricorso [ 2, 5, 7, 8 ]
1. Possono essere oggetto di ricorso al Tribunale cantonale
- le decisioni pronunciate dall'Ufficio dell'esecuzione delle pene;
- le decisioni pronunciate su ricorso dal Servizio penitenziario;
- le decisioni pronunciate dal giudice dell'applicazione delle pene e dal collegio dei giudici dell'applicazione delle pene che non possono essere oggetto di appello;
- ...
2. La procedura è retta dalle disposizioni del CPP [E] relative al ricorso.
3. ...
4. Quando il ricorso concerne la reintegrazione di una persona condannata in regime ordinario di esecuzione di pena o di misura, le decisioni sull'effetto sospensivo sono prese da tre giudici.
Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (399)
719----------- · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)
Appeal Against Refusal to Postpone Prison Sentence Execution Denied
Cited as the basis for the Cantonal Court's competence to review the decision of the Office of Sentence Execution regarding the postponement request.
529----------- · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)
Convict's Appeal on Suspended Family Leave Due to Undisclosed Pornography Use
This provision establishes the court's jurisdiction to rule on the appeal against the decision of the Prison Execution Office.
490----------- · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)
Prosecutor v. Convict on Addiction Treatment Efficacy
This provision governed the admissibility of the appeal filed against the decision of the judge responsible for the execution of sentences.
366----------- · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)
Denial of Appeal for Electronic Monitoring Due to Procedural Defect
Cited in the heading as context for the appeal jurisdiction, but not explicitly used in the final orders.
D.cision.2023.29 · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)
Appeal Regarding Prolongation of Therapeutic Measure Contingent on Deportation
Cited in the heading and in reasoning 1.1 as the basis for the appeal jurisdiction of the Cantonal Review Chamber.
D.cision.2023.28 · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)
Appeal Dismissed: Termination of Institutional Addiction Treatment Upheld Due to Non-Compliance
Cited regarding the admissibility of the appeal against the decision of the execution judge.
D.cision.2023.26 · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)
Prison Disciplinary Warning Upheld for Inmate Altercation
Cited in the reasoning section to establish jurisdiction for the appeal against the Penitentiary Service decision.
D.cision.2023.29 · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)
Detainee Appeal Regarding Unauthorized Possessions and Disciplinary Warning Upheld
Cited in the preamble to the decision, indicating the legal basis for the appeal to the Cantonal Tribunal against the decision of the Penitentiary Service.
149----------- · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)
Appeal Regarding Conditional Release Denial and Extension of Therapeutic Institutional Measure
This provision dictates the admissibility of the appeal to the Cantonal Tribunal (Chambre des recours pénale).
D.cision.2023.18 · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)
Prisoner's Appeal of Disciplinary Confinement Sanction and Denial of Legal Aid
This article establishes the basis for appealing a decision by the Penitentiary Service to the Cantonal Court.
D.cision.2023.55 · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)
Appeal Regarding Execution of Prison Sentence Due to Medical Condition Denied
Cited as the basis for the jurisdiction of the Cantonal Tribunal to review decisions from the execution office.
D.cision.2023.41 · vd (Art. 38 LEP)
Appellant v. Penal Execution Office (Electronic Monitoring Denial)
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the jurisdiction of the Execution Office to rule on electronic monitoring.
37----------- · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)
Appeal Regarding Postponement of Prison Sentence and Semi-Detention Request Due to Expulsion Order
Cited as the basis defining the authority of the Cantonal High Court to rule on appeals against decisions made by the Prison Execution Office.
984----------- · vd (Art. 38 al. 1 LEP)
Appeal Regarding Recusal Denial, Prison Transfer, and Solitary Confinement Justified by Reoffending Risk
Cited in the reasoning regarding the admissibility of the appeal against decisions of the Execution of Sentences Office, although the primary use is procedural context rather than a final operative order.
969----------- · vd (Art. 38 LEP)
Inmate Refusal to Return Pen Upheld as Disciplinary Offense
Cited as the basis for the admissibility of the appeal to the Cantonal Court against the decision of the Penitentiary Service.