Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
320.100 EGZZPOLACPC CH-GR

Art. 7 Legge d'applicazione del Codice di diritto processuale civile svizzero (LACPC) - Autorità giudiziaria superiore

Competenza delle autorità di conciliazione e dei tribunali civili
Apri la fonte ufficiale Atto completo (22 Articoli) Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Art. 7 LACPC · Autorità giudiziaria superiore

1. Quale autorità giudiziaria superiore, il Tribunale d'appello giudica appelli e ricorsi.

2. Esso decide nella composizione di giudice unico

a) * in merito a ricorsi;

abis) * in merito ad appelli contro decisioni in procedura sommaria;

b) * se un rimedio giuridico è palesemente inammissibile o palesemente fondato o infondato.

3. Il Tribunale d'appello decide nella composizione di tre giudici in merito a controversie conformemente al capoverso 2 lettera a e lettera abis, se ciò viene richiesto da una delle parti nella prima memoria, se il valore litigioso supera i 10 000 franchi e se il rimedio giuridico non è palesemente inammissibile o palesemente fondato o infondato.

4. Negli altri casi il Tribunale d'appello decide nella composizione prevista dalla legge sull'organizzazione giudiziaria.

← Art. 6 LACPC Legge d'applicazione del Codice di diritto processuale civile svizzero (LACPC) - Oggetto Art. 8 LACPC →

Ti chiedi come si applica questa disposizione alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa norma insieme alla giurisprudenza, ai commentari e alle disposizioni correlate in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Decisioni giudiziarie che applicano questa disposizione (227)

ZR2 2025 10 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 2 lit. b EGzZPO)
Application for Remission of Court Costs Denied Due to Insufficient Proof of Permanent Indigence and Prior Denial of Legal Aid
This article is cited to confirm the competence of the single judge for this type of application.
ZR2 2025 8 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 2 lit. b EGzZPO)
Request for Litigation Cost Waiver Denied Due to Insufficient Proof of Permanent Indigence and Prior Legal Aid Rejection
This procedural rule was cited alongside Art. 38 Abs. 3 GOG to justify the decision being made by a single judge.
ZR1 2025 24 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 4 EGzZPO)
Appellate Court Garnishment Jurisdiction Over Provisional Child Support Arrears
Cited in the reasoning to establish the court's competence to rule on the collection order while the main proceeding is pending.
ZR1 2025 24 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 4 EGzZPO)
Appellate Court Jurisdiction Over Garnishee Order for Provisional Child Support Enforcement
Cited to establish the court's competence (in conjunction with Art. 9 GOG) to decide on the garnishee order while the main case is pending.
ZR1 2025 30 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 2 lit. c EGzZPO)
Cost Waiver Denial for Outstanding Court Fees Due to Insufficient Substantiation of Financial Hardship
This procedural rule determined the single-judge competence to rule on the application because it was deemed obviously unfounded.
ZR2 2025 1 · gr (Art. 38 Abs. 3 GOG [BR 173.000] und Art. 7 Abs. 2 lit. abis und lit. b i. V. m. Art. 7 Abs. 3 e contrario EGzZPO [BR 320.100])
Landlord Eviction Upheld for Breach of Settlement Condition
Cited in the reasoning justifying the decision being made by a single judge.
KSK 2024 85 · gr (art. 7 cpv. 2 lett. b LACPC [CSC 320.100])
Enforcement Creditor v. Debtor (Heating Cost Adjustment Enforceability)
Cited as the legal basis for the President ruling as a single judge due to the obvious unfoundedness of the appeal.
ZK2 2024 24 · gr (art. 7 cpv. 1 LACPC)
Claimant v. Conciliation Authority (Undue Delay)
Cited to establish the competence of the Second Civil Chamber of the Cantonal Court to rule on the appeal for undue delay.
ZK2 2024 24 · gr (art. 7 cpv. 2 lett. b LACPC)
Claimant v. Conciliation Authority (Undue Delay)
Cited as the legal basis for deciding the manifestly founded appeal by a single judge.
ZK2 2024 25 · gr (art. 7 cpv. 2 lett. b LACPC)
Complaint Regarding Delayed Conciliation Hearing
Cited to justify the decision being made by a single judge.
KSK 2024 63 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 2 lit. b EGzZPO)
Appeal Against Bankruptcy Proceedings Over Sole Proprietorship Due to Unpaid Insurance Premiums
Cited in connection with Art. 18 Abs. 3 GOG as the basis for rendering the decision in single-judge competence because the appeal was evidently well-founded.
KSK 2024 17 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 1 EGzZPO)
Social Security Contribution Office v. Debtor (Definitive Legal Authorization for Enforcement)
Cited in the reasoning for establishing the jurisdiction of the Cantonal Court.
KSK 2024 17 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 2 lit. a EGzZPO)
Social Security Contribution Office v. Debtor (Definitive Legal Authorization for Enforcement)
Cited in the reasoning for establishing the jurisdiction of the Single Judge due to the value in dispute.
ZK1 2023 75 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 1 EGzZPO)
Child Support Arrears Offset Period Limitation
Cited in the reasoning section regarding the deadline and formal requirements for lodging an appeal.
ZK2 2024 15 · gr (Art. 7 Abs. 2 lit. b EGzZPO)
Cantonal Court Dismisses Appeal Against Eviction Due to Untimely Filing and Procedural Defects
Cited as the basis for the decision being rendered by a single judge because the appeal was obviously unfounded.