Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Sklep VIII DoR 107/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2010:VIII.DOR.107.2009 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses review application as no conditions for review under ZPP Article 367a are met.

Numero d'incarto Sklep VIII DoR 107/2009
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia rejected the applicant's request for permission to file a review against the final judgment. The first-instance court ordered the defendant to pay 11,125.62 EUR plus interest, taxes, and costs, which the second-instance court upheld. The Supreme Court found that the conditions for allowing a review under Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act were not satisfied.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act; A review application is dismissed when the applicant fails to demonstrate that the decision is legally erroneous or that there are other statutory grounds for review.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
review application Civil Procedure Act final judgment legal error second instance supreme court dismissed credito contestato

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Article 367a of the Civil Procedure Act
Generato dall'IA
VSK Sodba I Cp 26/2019
Appeal partially allowed; mental pain damages reduced; property damages upheld for future period.
VSL sodba II Cp 1358/2016
Appeal dismissed; notarial deed is mandatory form for share transfer agreement validity under Slovenian law.
VSL Sodba I Cpg 323/2021
Appeal court dismissed damages claim for insult as plaintiff failed to prove employer's malicious intent.
VSL sklep I Cpg 182/2016
Appeal allowed; first instance court erred by failing to remand case for proper claim individualization.
VSL sodba II Cp 1658/2015
State liability dismissed; qualified fault required for administrative acts causing damage.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Na podlagi navedb tožnika v predlogu za dopustitev revizije Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije ugotavlja, da ne obstajajo pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je ugodilo tožbenemu zahtevku, da je tožena stranka dolžna tožniku izplačati 11.125,62 EUR z zakonskimi obrestmi in na tako izplačan znesek obračunati davke in prispevke ter odmerjene stroške postopka. Sodišče druge stopnje je pritožbo tožene stranke zavrnilo in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

2. Na podlagi navedb tožnika v predlogu za dopustitev revizije zoper pravnomočno sodbo sodišča druge stopnje Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije ugotavlja, da ne obstajajo pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz 367.a člena ZPP.