Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Sklep I R 27/2000 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2000:I.R.27.2000 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court rejects transfer of jurisdiction request due to lack of statutory grounds under ZPP Art. 67.

Numero d'incarto Sklep I R 27/2000
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the defendant's request to transfer the case to another competent court. The defendant argued that the current court was biased, but failed to provide specific factual circumstances justifying a transfer under Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act. The court ruled that without evidence of procedural inefficiency or other significant reasons, the statutory conditions for transferring jurisdiction were not met.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act; A transfer of jurisdiction to another competent court is only permissible when there are clear circumstances indicating that the proceedings would be conducted more easily or other significant reasons exist, which the defendant failed to substantiate.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
transfer of jurisdiction competent court Civil Procedure Act procedural efficiency defendant's request statutory conditions lack of evidence clausola di coscienza

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act
Generato dall'IA
VDS sklep Psp 255/2002
Social court has jurisdiction over employer liability claims for disability benefits under ZPIZ Art. 282. ZDSS Art. 2.5.
Sklep I R 13/96
Supreme Court dismisses delegation request where personal acquaintance of parties does not constitute a weighty reason for easier proceedings.
Sklep I R 4/2007
Supreme Court transfers case to Ljubljana court due to prior misconduct by Celja judge affecting impartiality perception.
VSC sklep Cpg 198/00
Appeal court quashes first instance ruling on jurisdiction for interim orders in administrative debt cases.
VDSS Sklep Pdp 643/2019
Appeal dismissed; removal dispute is corporate, not labor, so general court has jurisdiction.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Predlogu za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča se ne ugodi.

[JEDRO]

Presoja obstoja okoliščin iz 67. člena ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Pri Okrožnem sodišču v Celju je v teku pravda med tožnikom in tožencem zaradi plačila odškodnine. Tožnik je tožbo vložil dne 20.5.1993. O zadevi še ni bilo odločeno. Dne 28.4.2000 pa je toženec podal predlog, naj vrhovno sodišče za sojenje v tej stvari določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče v državi. Toženec je namreč mnenja, "da sodišče odloča ves čas v njegovo škodo."

Predlog ni utemeljen.

Po določbi 67. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku lahko vrhovno sodišče na strankin predlog določi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, da postopa v zadevi, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek, ali če so za to drugi tehtni razlogi. Toženec pa v svoji vlogi ne navaja nobenih okoliščin, ki bi mogle pogojevati uporabo navedene zakonske določbe in utemeljevati določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča. Trditev o tem, da sodišče odloča v njegovo škodo, je pravno in vsebinsko prazna in tudi ne temelji na podatkih spisa. Ker ni na razpolago pogojev, zaradi katerih bi bilo mogoče določiti za sojenje drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, vrhovno sodišče predlogu ni ugodilo.