Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Sklep II DoR 96/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.96.2009 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allowed appeal regarding violation of material procedural leadership in first and second instance courts.

Numero d'incarto Sklep II DoR 96/2009
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of the Republic of Slovenia granted permission for an appeal against the second-instance court's decision. The appellant argued that the first-instance court failed to properly lead the proceedings, causing surprise regarding the court's stance on incomplete submissions concerning an agreement. The court ruled that the conditions for allowing the appeal were met under the relevant procedural law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure; An appeal is permitted regarding violations of material procedural leadership before courts of the first and second instance.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
material procedural leadership civil procedure law appeal permission procedural violation second instance court first instance court ZPP article 367a raggiungimento del valore soglia

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Article 367a paragraph 1 of the Act on Civil Procedure (ZPP)
Generato dall'IA
VDSS sodba Pdp 1354/2010
Appeal dismissed: Employer paid wages knowing of overpayment without reservation, so no restitution right exists under OZ s. 191.
Sodba III Ips 34/2011
Court dismisses appeal where defendant's conduct constituted implied acknowledgment of debt, interrupting limitation periods. Defendant cannot retract implied acknowledgment. Limitation period expired.
VSL sklep I Cpg 782/99
Court allows appeal, quashing first instance judgment where agent's unauthorized sale was deemed ratified by principal's subsequent disposal.
VSL Sodba I Cp 1305/2017
Appeal dismissed; unjust enrichment claim rejected where payment was based on performed services.
VSL sodba III Cp 2828/2010
Insurance company appeal dismissed; insurer not in delay for requiring expert medical assessment before paying claim.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije je revizijo dopustilo glede vprašanja kršitve materialnega procesnega vodstva pred sodišči prve in druge stopnje.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Revizija se dopusti glede vprašanja kršitve materialnega procesnega vodstva pred sodišči prve in druge stopnje.

OBRAZLOŽITEV:

1. Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek za plačilo 1,186.221,30 SIT z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od 7. 11. 2003. Zavrnilo je tudi tožbeni zahtevek za plačilo 640.018 SIT z zakonskimi zamudnimi obrestmi od zapadlosti posameznih zneskov do plačila. Odločilo je še o pravdnih stroških.

2. Sodišče druge stopnje je zavrnilo pritožbo tožeče stranke in potrdilo sodbo sodišča prve stopnje.

3. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje je tožeča stranka na podlagi 367.b člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP) vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije, v katerem graja pomanjkljivo materialno procesno vodstvo sodišča prve stopnje, oziroma meni, da je stališče sodišča druge stopnje o nepopolnosti navedb v zvezi z dogovorom pomenilo presenečenje za tožečo stranko.

4. Predlog je utemeljen.

5. Ker so izpolnjeni pogoji za dopustitev revizije iz prvega odstavka 367.a člena ZPP, je Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije revizijo dopustilo glede vprašanja kršitve materialnega procesnega vodstva pred sodišči prve in druge stopnje.