Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Sklep I R 19/2000 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2000:I.R.19.2000 Generato dall'IA

Court rejects transfer of jurisdiction due to former extramarital partner relationship as no impartiality issue exists.

Numero d'incarto Sklep I R 19/2000
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia rejected the lower court's request to transfer jurisdiction to another court. The lower court argued that a dispute involving a former extramarital partner of a court clerk might compromise impartiality, citing Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act. The Supreme Court found no basis for transfer because the opposing party was not a clerk and the past relationship does not hinder proceedings.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act; A former extramarital relationship between a party and a court clerk does not constitute grounds for transferring jurisdiction if the clerk is not a party and no impartiality is compromised.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
transfer of jurisdiction impartiality of judge extramarital partner court clerk Civil Procedure Act removal of case procedural objection controprogetto

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Article 67 of the Civil Procedure Act
Generato dall'IA
VSC sklep Kr 41/2000
Extramarital relationship between defendant and court clerk justifies transfer of territorial jurisdiction to another court.
Sklep I R 135/2005
Supreme Court rejects delegation request due to procedural conclusion and principle of economic efficiency.
Sklep I R 105/2002
Personal acquaintance with a party does not constitute a valid reason to delegate a case under Article 67 of the ZPP.
Sklep I R 30/2002
Slovenian Supreme Court dismisses transfer request where client's relative is retired court employee.
Sklep I R 7/96
Court transfers case to another district court due to long-term juror relationship causing impartiality doubts.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Predlogu za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča se ne ugodi.

[JEDRO]

Presoja obstoja pogojev za delegacijo pristojnosti.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Predstojnica Okrajnega sodišča na Jesenicah v predlogu za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča za odločanje v pravdni zadevi opr. št. 40/2000 navaja, da je prvi toženec A. A. bivši izvenzakonski partner strojepiske na tem sodišču B. B.. Spore z njo rešuje v več pravdnih postopkih. To bi lahko povzročilo dvom o nepristranskem odločanju. Zato na podlagi 67. člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku predlaga prenos pristojnosti na drugo sodišče.

Predlog ni utemeljen.

Iz predloga ne izhaja, da bi bila v postopku udeležena tudi B. B., strojepiska pri Okrajnem sodišču na Jesenicah. Toženec A. A. je po navedbah predloga bivši izvenzakonski partner B. B. Takšna nekdanja zveza pa ni razlog, ki bi oteževal izvedbo postopka.

Glede na navedeno razlogi po 67. členu Zakona o pravdnem postopku niso podani. Zato je Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije predlog za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča zavrnilo.