Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Sklep II DoR 20/2009 ECLI:SI:VSRS:2009:II.DOR.20.2009 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses leave for appeal request due to lack of relevant legal questions under ZPP Art. 367a.

Numero d'incarto Sklep II DoR 20/2009
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia dismissed the applicant's request for leave to appeal, confirming the lower courts' rejection of a damages claim. The applicant argued for legal certainty and uniform application of law but failed to identify specific relevant legal issues in their petition. Consequently, the court ruled that the statutory requirements for granting leave to appeal were not met.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Zakon o pravdnem postopku (ZPP), 367. a člen; 367. c člen: A request for leave to appeal is inadmissible if the applicant fails to state relevant legal questions, thereby not fulfilling the statutory conditions for such a procedural step.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
leave to appeal relevant legal questions ZPP Article 367a procedural admissibility Supreme Court review damages claim legal certainty calcolo delle indennità giornaliere

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
367. a člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
367. c člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP)
Generato dall'IA
VDSS sodba Pdp 1153/2011
Court dismisses claim for return of overpaid wages based on forged diploma, ruling final judgments were valid. Claimant must bear appeal costs.
VSL sodba I Cp 1246/2013
Appeal dismissed; plaintiff failed to prove intentional damage required for direct claim against employees.
VSK sodba in sklep I Cp 1711/2005
Workplace asbestos exposure damages include mental suffering from reduced life activities even without physical injury.
VSL Sodba I Cp 339/2019
Court partially allows appeal, ordering defendant to pay damages and costs while rejecting claim for shared liability.
VSL Sodba II Cp 1738/2022
Worker's injury claim dismissed; employee bears primary safety responsibility per ZVZD-1.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Predlog se zavrne.

[JEDRO]

Ker tožeča stranka v predlogu za dopustitev revizije ni navedla relevantnih pravnih vprašanj, ni izpolnila pogojev iz 367. a člena ZPP.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

1. Prvostopenjsko sodišče je zavrnilo tožbeni zahtevek tožeče stranke za plačilo zneska 31.964.61 EUR, kolikor je na podlagi izvensodne poravnave z dne 21. 3. 2003 predhodno izplačala tožencu kot odškodnino. Sodišče druge stopnje je tožničino pritožbo zavrnilo in potrdilo prvostopenjsko sodbo.

2. Zoper sodbo sodišča druge stopnje je tožeča stranka vložila predlog za dopustitev revizije zaradi zagotovitve pravne varnosti in enotne uporabe prava.

3. Ker tožeča stranka v predlogu za dopustitev revizije ni navedla relevantnih pravnih vprašanj, ni izpolnila pogojev iz 367. a člena Zakona o pravdnem postopku (ZPP). Vrhovno sodišče je zato predlog na podlagi drugega odstavka 367. c člena ZPP zavrnilo.