Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VSC sklep Kp 113/2000 ECLI:SI:VSCE:2000:KP.113.2000 Generato dall'IA

Appeal by victim dismissed as inadmissible because they had no right to appeal the first-instance ruling.

Numero d'incarto VSC sklep Kp 113/2000
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Court of Appeal dismissed the victim's appeal against the first-instance judge's decision to exclude a specific court member. Although the first-instance court incorrectly stated that an appeal was possible, the victim had no legal right to appeal that specific ruling. Consequently, the second-instance court rejected the appeal as inadmissible under the Criminal Procedure Act, ruling that the error in the first-instance court's instructions did not create a right to appeal.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

V. odstavek 42. člen Zakona o kazenskem postopku; 389. člen Zakona o kazenskem postopku: An appeal is inadmissible if the appellant had no legal right to appeal the first-instance decision, even if the first-instance court erroneously indicated that an appeal was permitted.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
inadmissible appeal victim's right to appeal Criminal Procedure Act error in first instance procedural standing autorizzazione ad agire difetto di legittimazione del ministero pubblico censura formulata in modo carente

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
V. odstavek 42. člen Zakona o kazenskem postopku
389. člen Zakona o kazenskem postopku
Generato dall'IA
VSL sklep I Cp 540/2000
Appeal dismissed; deputy president validly decided recusal request when chief judge recused due to conflict of interest.
UPRS Sodba I U 1861/2021-13
Administrative court dismisses appeal and free legal aid request due to lack of impartiality grounds and financial eligibility.
VSL Sklep II Cp 1978/2022
Appeal dismissed because no special appeal exists for rejecting a judge's recusal request; only appeal against final judgment is allowed.
VSK sklep Cpg 45/2011
Appeal dismissed because Article 108 of the Civil Procedure Act does not apply to appeals.
VSM sklep Cpg 239/94
Appeal allowed; labor court jurisdiction established for disputes pending before unified courts before new law.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Pritožba oškodovanca J. R. se z a v r ž e kot nedovoljena.

[JEDRO]

Tudi, če je sodišče 1. stopnje navedlo na izpodbijanem sklepu napačni pouk o pritožbi, in se je oškodovanec zato pravočasno pritožil, se takšna pritožba v postopku na 2. stopnji zavrže kot nedovoljena, ker oškodovancu pravica do pritožbe ni pripadala.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z uvodoma navedenim sklepom je predstojnica sodišča prve stopnje zavrgla oškodovančevo zahtevo za izločitev razpravljajoče sodnice kot nedovoljeno. V sklepu je izrecno navedla možnost pritožbe. Oškodovanec se je zoper ta sklep pravočasno pritožil. Grajal je delo razpravljajoče sodnice in poslovanje sodišča prve stopnje ter predlagal prenos pristojnosti na sodišče v C.. Pritožba ni dovoljena. Ne glede na napačen pouk o dovoljenosti pritožbe sodišče druge stopnje ni moglo odločati o njeni utemeljenosti, saj ta po določbi V. odstavka 42. člena Zakona o kazenskem postopku ni dovoljena. Zato je moralo pritožbo zavreči, kakor to določa 389. člen istega zakona.