Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VSK sklep Cpg 348/99 ECLI:SI:VSKP:1999:CPG.348.99 Generato dall'IA

Enforcement suspended due to failure to deposit security; appeal dismissed as notice was properly served.

Numero d'incarto VSK sklep Cpg 348/99
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The High Court in Koper dismissed the creditor's appeal, upholding the first-instance court's decision to suspend enforcement. The creditor failed to deposit security for enforcement costs within the eight-day period after receiving a formal notice served on their authorized representative. The court rejected the creditor's claim that they never received the notice, finding the service record valid and the suspension legally justified under the Enforcement Act.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

3. odst. 32. čl. Zakona o izvršilnem postopku (ZIP): If a creditor fails to deposit security for enforcement costs within the prescribed period after being notified, the court must suspend enforcement, and such suspension stands if the notice was properly served.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
enforcement suspension security deposit requirement service of notice enforcement costs creditor appeal ZIP Act provision authorized representative obbligo di anticipare spese

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
3. odst. 32. čl. Zakona o izvršilnem postopku (ZIP)
Z izpodbijanim sklepom je sodišče prve stopnje ustavilo izvršbo v skladu z določilom 3. odst. 32. čl. Zakona o izvršilnem postopku (ZIP), ker upnik v določenem 8-dnevnem roku ni založil predujma.
Generato dall'IA
VSL sklep III Cp 655/2000
Appeal dismissed; enforcement suspended due to failure to pay advance execution costs after proper notice.
VSL sklep II Cpg 174/2001
Appeal allowed; court held ZIZ Art. 38(3) applies only to non-payment, not failure to submit proof of payment.
VSL sklep III Cp 1935/2000
Appeal allowed: Court quashes first instance ruling for failing to decide on extension of advance payment deadline.
VSL sklep II Cpg 875/2000
Appeal dismissed because appellant admitted failure to deposit advance execution costs as required by law.
VSL sklep III Cp 234/2000
Enforcement suspended due to creditor's failure to post security for external enforcement agent costs.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Pritožba upnika se zavrne kot neutemeljena in p o t r d i izpodbijani sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

[JEDRO]

Če upnik v danem roku na poziv sodišča ni položil predujma za kritje stroškov izvršilnega organa, sodišče izvršbo ustavi.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Z izpodbijanim sklepom je sodišče prve stopnje ustavilo izvršbo v skladu z določilom 3. odst. 32. čl. Zakona o izvršilnem postopku (ZIP), ker upnik v določenem 8-dnevnem roku ni založil predujma.

Zoper ta sklep se pritožuje upnik po svoji pooblaščenki in predlaga njegovo razveljavitev. V pritožbi navaja, da upnik nikoli ni prejel sklepa o naložitvi plačila predujma za izvršilne stroške.

Pritožba upnika ni utemeljena.

Pritožbeno sodišče ugotavlja, da je sodišče prve stopnje izpodbijani sklep izdalo v skladu z določilom tedaj veljavnega 3. odst. 32. čl.

ZIP. Poziv, naj upnik založi predujem, je bil namreč vročen pooblaščenki upnika dne 29.5.1997 (list. št. 9 spisa). Pritožbeno sodišče je zato pritožbo upnika zavrnilo kot neutemeljeno in potrdilo izpodbijani sklep sodišča prve stopnje.