Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VSK sklep Cp 520/99 ECLI:SI:VSKP:1999:CP.520.99 Generato dall'IA

Appeal dismissed because withdrawal of lawsuit removes legal interest to challenge prior interim order rejection.

Numero d'incarto VSK sklep Cp 520/99
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The appellate court dismissed the appeal filed against the first-instance court's rejection of a request for an interim order securing the claim. The appellant had timely lodged the appeal but subsequently withdrew the underlying lawsuit before the appeal was decided. The court ruled that the withdrawal extinguished the appellant's legal interest in challenging the earlier procedural decision, rendering the appeal inadmissible under the relevant procedural law.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

352. člen Zakona o pravdnem postopku; Withdrawal of the lawsuit generally eliminates the legal interest for appealing a prior order rejecting a request for an interim measure to secure the claim.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
withdrawal of lawsuit legal interest interim order appeal dismissal procedural law claim security Zakon o pravdnem postopku danno imminente

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
352. člen veljavnega Zakona o pravdnem postopku
Zato je pritožbeno sodišče pritožbo zavrglo (352. člen veljavnega Zakona o pravdnem postopku).
Generato dall'IA
VDSS sklep Pdp 1141/2012
Appeal dismissed; debt acknowledgment in bankruptcy deemed fulfillment of claim, allowing cost award despite plaintiff's withdrawal.
VSL sklep I Cpg 719/2011
Appeal court orders withdrawing plaintiff to pay defendant costs under ZPP Art. 158(1) due to withdrawal.
VDSS sklep Pdp 243/2016
Appeal dismissed; employer must pay employee's costs after debt recognition in bankruptcy proceedings.
VSL sklep I Cpg 270/2011
Appeal allowed; first instance court erred by assuming withdrawal without consent and failing to rule on costs.
VSL sklep I Cp 1600/2000
Appeal allowed; vague withdrawal notice does not constitute legal withdrawal under ZPP Art. 188.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Pritožbo proti izpodbijanemu sklepu sodišča prve stopnje se z a v r ž e .

[JEDRO]

V primeru umika tožbe, tožeča stranka praviloma nima pravnega interesa za pritožbo proti predhodno izdanemu sklepu o zavrnitvi predloga za izdajo začasne odredbe zaradi zavarovanja terjatve, ki je vsebovana v tožbenem zahtevku.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Sodišče prve stopnje je zavrnilo predlog tožeče stranke, da izda začasno odredbo v pravdnem postopku.

Tožeča stranka se je pravočasno pritožila proti navedenemu sklepu sodišča prve stopnje, dne ... pa je umaknila tožbo.

Tožeča stranka je predlagala izdajo začasne odredbe zato, da bi zavarovala svojo terjatev, glede katere je bila vložena tožba. Z umikom tožbe tožeča stranka nima več pravnega interesa za pritožbo proti sklepu sodišča, s katerim je bil tožničin predlog zavrnjen.

Zato je pritožbeno sodišče pritožbo zavrglo (352. člen veljavnega Zakona o pravdnem postopku).