Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
Sklep I R 59/97 ECLI:SI:VSRS:1997:I.R.59.97 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court transfers case to another court because defendant is extramarital partner of judge.

Numero d'incarto Sklep I R 59/97
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Slovenia designated the District Court in R as the competent court for this matter. The original District Court in J proposed a transfer because the defendant was the extramarital partner of a clerk at that court. The Supreme Court found this relationship a significant reason for the transfer to ensure procedural efficiency.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Article 68 of the Civil Procedure Act; A court may designate another competent court if it is evident that the proceedings will be conducted more easily or if there are other significant reasons, such as the defendant being an extramarital partner of a court clerk.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
extramarital partner court clerk judicial bias competent court procedural efficiency Civil Procedure Act transfer of jurisdiction revoca dell'opposizione

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Article 68 of the Civil Procedure Act
Generato dall'IA
Sklep I R 124/2002
Slovenian Supreme Court rejects transfer of jurisdiction based on vague distrust and unproven family ties.
VSC sklep Kr 68/2007
Court transfers criminal case due to judge's employment conflict but rejects defense lawyer's office location objection.
VSRS sklep I R 42/2015
Court rejects transfer of jurisdiction due to former judge's acquaintance with lawyer, finding no impartiality issue.
Sklep I R 65/2005
Court dismisses case against judge due to impartiality concerns and transfers jurisdiction to another court.
VSC sklep PRp 2/2008
Court rejects transfer of jurisdiction request based on perceived bias and procedural efficiency claims.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Za odločanje v tej zadevi se določi Okrajno sodišče v R.

[JEDRO]

Okoliščina, da je stranka v pravdi izvenzakonski partner sodne uslužbenke, je tehten razlog za določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Pri Okrajnem sodišču na J. je upnik proti dolžniku vložil predlog za izdajo začasne odredbe zaradi zavarovanja nedenarne terjatve ter zaznambe prepovedi v zemljiški knjigi.

Okrajno sodišče na J. je dne 12.11.1997 po predstojnici predlagalo določitev drugega stvarno pristojnega sodišča v skladu z določbo 68. člena ZPP, ker je dolžnik A. P. izvenzakonski partner strojepiske - zapisnikarice na sodišču, pred katerim naj bi se vodil postopek.

Predlog je utemeljen.

Po 68. členu ZPP lahko Vrhovno sodišče Republike Slovenije na predlog stranke ali pristojnega sodišča odloči, naj postopa v posamezni zadevi drugo stvarno pristojno sodišče, če je očitno, da se bo tako laže opravil postopek, ali če so za to drugi tehtni razlogi. Obstoj slednjega, torej tehtnih razlogov, ki pogojujejo delegacijo pristojnosti, je iz vloge Okrajnega sodišča na J. razviden in objektivno izkazan. Za odločanje v tej stvari je bilo zato delegirano Okrajno sodišče v R.