Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
VSM sklep Cpg 89/94 ECLI:SI:VSMB:1994:CPG.89.94 Generato dall'IA

Bankruptcy court must refer disputed debt portion to court for verification under ZPPSL Art. 127/I.

Numero d'incarto VSM sklep Cpg 89/94
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Slovenia (SI)
Data della decisione
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The High Court in Maribor dismissed the appellant's protest against the first-instance court's order to refer a partially disputed debt to judicial verification. The bankruptcy administrator had acknowledged a portion of the creditor's claim while disputing the remainder, which the court deemed a valid partial rejection. Consequently, the court ruled that the administrator must initiate a legal proceeding within eight days to determine the validity of the rejected portion, ensuring the creditor's rights are protected through formal litigation.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

člen 127/I Zakona o prisilni poravnavi, stečaju in likvidaciji: When a bankruptcy administrator partially rejects a creditor's claim, the bankruptcy senate must refer the disputed portion to the court for verification within eight days.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
bankruptcy administrator partial claim rejection judicial verification procedure ZPPSL Article 127/I creditor's rights protection debt dispute resolution procedural obligation violazioni delle norme procedurali

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
člen 127/I Zakona o prisilni poravnavi, stečaju in likvidaciji (ZPPSL)
Generato dall'IA
VSM sklep Cpg 463/94
Bankruptcy law requires creditors to state legal basis for claims; execution request alone is insufficient.
VDS sklep Pdp 63/2001
Appeal dismissed: Heirs of a deceased creditor who contested a claim do not automatically succeed in the bankruptcy proceeding.
VSL sklep I Cpg 42/2011
Appeal allowed; claim for annulment of corporate resolutions is not a bankruptcy claim requiring declaration. Court found first instance misapplied bankruptcy law regarding claim declaration. Claimant must now prove standing under company law despite bankruptcy. Appeal allowed; claim for annulment of corporate resolutions is not a bankruptcy claim requiring declaration. Court found first instance misapplied bankruptcy law regarding claim declaration. Claimant must now prove standing under company law despite bankruptcy.
VSM sklep Cpg 342/94
Bankruptcy court must refer debtor to court for debt verification if administrator fully rejects claim.
VSM sklep Cpg 102/95
Appeal dismissed; bankruptcy administrator's debt recognition triggers mandatory court referral for creditor's objection.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Pritožba se zavrne kot neutemeljena in se potrdi sklep sodišča prve stopnje.

[JEDRO]

V primeru, ko stečajni upraviltelj prereka upnikovo terjatev, mora stečajni senat po določilu člena 127/I zakona o prisilni poravnavi, stečaju in likvidaciji - v nadaljevanju ZPPSL napotiti stečajnega upnika, da začne v osmih dneh od vročitve sklepa postopek pred sodiščem za ugotovitev prerekanega dela terjatve.

[OBRAZLOŽITEV]

Stečajni upnik se je pravočasno pritožil zoper sklep prvostopnega sodišča, ki je upnika zaradi ugotovitve obstoja prijavljene terjatve tolarske protivrednosti 2.297,35 DEM napotilo na pravdo.

Pritožba ni utemeljena.

Iz zapisnika o drugem naroku za preizkus upniških terjatev, ki je bil opravljen dne 9.12.1993 je razvidno, da je stečajni upravitelj v prerekal terjatev upnikovo terjatev v znesku 3.736,35 DEM za delni znesek 2.297,35 DEM, za presežnih 1.439,00 DEM - v tolarski protivrednosti, pa je terjatev priznal. V takem primeru mora stečajni senat po določilu člena 127/I zakona o prisilni poravnavi, stečaju in likvidaciji - v nadaljevanju ZPPSL (Ur.l. SFRJ št. 84/89, ki se po členu 4 ustavnega zakona za izvedbo ustavne listine ... še uporablja v RS za stečaje, ki so bili začeti pred 1.1.1994), napotiti stečajnega upnika, da začne v osmih dneh od vročitve sklepa postopek pred sodiščem za ugotovitev prerekanega dela terjatve.

Utemeljenost upnikove terjatve se bo torej ugotavljala v pravdnem postopku, če bo upnik vložil tožbo. Upnik si napačno tolmači izpodbijani sklep, da je že odločeno o njegovi terjatvi. Prvostopno sodišče je tudi pravilno opozorilo upnika na rok za vložitev ugotovitvene tožbe in obvezo, da obvesti o tem stečajni senat - le-ta bo samo v takem primeru rezerviral ustrezna sredstva za plačilo prijavljene terjatve do pravnomočne odločitve pravdnega sodišča o tej terjatvi.