Admissibility of preliminary ruling on credit institution capital adequacy and civil debt enforcement by assignee creditor under OUG 99/2006 and 1864 Civil Code
Romania (RO)
Sintesi Legislator
Generato dall'IAThe High Court of Cassation and Justice dismissed as inadmissible the request for a preliminary ruling filed by the Specialized Cluj Tribunal, meaning no binding interpretation was issued and the original proceedings remain unresolved by this specific court. The dispute concerned the interpretation and application of Article 120 of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 99/2006 regarding credit institutions and capital adequacy, in conjunction with Article 1396 of the 1864 Civil Code, specifically within the context of a request for judicial authorization of forced execution of a credit contract where the creditor was the assignee of the claim. The court's decision relied on the procedural requirements set forth in Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code adopted by Law No. 134/2010 to determine the inadmissibility of the submission.
Regesto Legislator
Generato dall'IAAdmissibility of preliminary ruling on credit institution capital adequacy and civil debt enforcement by assignee creditor under OUG 99/2006 and 1864 Civil Code: The dispute concerned the interpretation and application of Article 120 of Emergency Government Ordinance No. 99/2006 regarding credit institutions and capital adequacy, in conjunction with Article 1396 of the 1864 Civil Code, specifically within the context of a request for judicial authorization of forced execution of a credit contract where the creditor was the assignee of the claim. The court's decision relied on the procedural requirements set forth in Article 521(3) of the Civil Procedure Code adopted by Law No. 134/2010 to determine the inadmissibility of the submission.
Parole chiave
Generato dall'IADecisioni correlate
Generato dall'IAQuestioni giuridiche chiave estratte da Legislator
Generato dall'IAProcedural basis cited to establish that the decision is mandatory and final.
Testo completo
ROMÂNIA
ÎNALTA CURTE DE CASAŢIE ŞI JUSTIŢIE
Completul pentru dezlegarea unor chestiuni de drept în materie civilă
Minuta deciziei nr. 3 Dosar nr. 1/1/2014/HP
ÎN NUMELE LEGII
DECIDE:
Respinge ca inadmisibilă sesizarea formulată de Tribunalul Specializat Cluj în dosarul nr. 15427/211/2013 privind pronunţarea unei hotărâri prealabile pentru dezlegarea modului de interpretare şi aplicare a dispoziţiilor art. 120 din Ordonanţa de Urgenţă a Guvernului nr. 99/2006 privind instituţiile de credit şi adecvarea capitalului, cu modificările şi completările ulterioare, coroborate cu art. 1396 din Codul civil de la 1864, în situaţia în care cererea de încuviinţare a executării silite a unui contract de credit este formulată de creditorul cesionar al creanţei.
Obligatorie, potrivit dispoziţiilor art. 521 alin. 3 din Codul de procedură civilă adoptat prin Legea nr. 134/2010.
Pronunţată în şedinţă publică, astăzi 14 aprilie 2014.