Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V KO 33/22 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses request to transfer case due to lack of jurisdictional conflict under criminal procedure law.

Numero d'incarto V KO 33/22
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court rejected the Regional Court's request to transfer the case to another court of equal jurisdiction. The defendant was charged with a data protection offense, and the lower court sought a transfer based on Article 37 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Supreme Court determined that no valid grounds for transfer existed under the cited legal provisions.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 37 k.p.k.; Art. 37a k.p.k.: A request to transfer a case to another court of equal jurisdiction is inadmissible if the statutory conditions for such transfer are not met or if the principle of a priori jurisdiction applies.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
criminal procedure law jurisdictional transfer equal jurisdiction data protection offense Supreme Court decision

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 37 k.p.k.
akt II K (…), o przekazanie sprawy do rozpoznania innemu sądowi równorzędnemu, na podstawie art. 37 a contrario k.p.k.
Art. 37a k.p.k.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V KO 33/22 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 26 maja 2022 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Tomasz Artymiuk w sprawie A. R. oskarżonej z art. 107 ust. 1 ustawy z dnia 10 maja 2018 r. o ochronie danych osobowych, po rozpoznaniu w Izbie Karnej na posiedzeniu w dniu 26 maja 2022 r. wniosku Sądu Rejonowego w T. z dnia 6 kwietnia 2022 r., sygn. akt II K (…), o przekazanie sprawy do rozpoznania innemu sądowi równorzędnemu, na podstawie art. 37 a contrario k.p.k. postanowił wniosku nie uwzględnić