Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V KO 22/18 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses retrial request as obviously unfounded due to lack of new evidence or procedural error.

Numero d'incarto V KO 22/18
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Poland rejected the defendant's request for a retrial under Article 545 § 3 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The defendant sought to overturn a final judgment from 2015, but the court found the grounds for retrial to be obviously unfounded. Consequently, the original conviction by the District Court and the subsequent appeal judgment were upheld without modification.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 545 § 3 k.p.k.; A request for retrial based on obvious lack of grounds is rejected when no new evidence or procedural violation justifies reopening the case.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
retrial request obviously unfounded Code of Criminal Procedure final judgment Supreme Court ruling

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 545 § 3 k.p.k.
S., po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu w trybie art. 545 § 3 k.p.k. w dniu 4 kwietnia 2018 r.
art. 545 § 3 k.p.k
S., po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu w trybie art. 545 § 3 k.p.k.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V KO 22/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 4 kwietnia 2018 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Andrzej Tomczyk w sprawie skazanego K. S., po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu w trybie art. 545 § 3 k.p.k. w dniu 4 kwietnia 2018 r. wniosku skazanego o wznowienie postępowania zakończonego prawomocnym wyrokiem Sądu Apelacyjnego w S. z dnia 5 lutego 2015 r., sygn. akt II AKa ../14, utrzymującym w mocy wyrok Sądu Okręgowego w S.e z dnia 6 sierpnia 2014 r., sygn. akt III K ../13, na podstawie art. 545 § 3 k.p.k. p o s t a n o w i ł odmówić przyjęcia wniosku wobec jego oczywistej bezzasadności.