Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V KK 83/19 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses defense's request to withdraw cassation appeal as procedurally inadmissible under Criminal Procedure Code.

Numero d'incarto V KK 83/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Inammissibile (Inadmissible)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court declared the defense attorney's request to withdraw the cassation appeal inadmissible. The defendant, G.D., had been convicted under the Drug Prevention Act and Criminal Code, and his lawyer attempted to retract the appeal filed against the appellate court's judgment. The court ruled that once a cassation appeal is formally lodged, the defendant cannot unilaterally withdraw it without the Supreme Court's explicit permission, which was not granted in this instance.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 419 § 1 k.p.k.; Art. 420 § 1 k.p.k.: Once a cassation appeal is filed, the defendant cannot withdraw it unilaterally; the court must assess the grounds for withdrawal and may permit it only if it does not undermine the finality of the proceedings.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation appeal withdrawal Criminal Procedure Code defense attorney request procedural inadmissibility finality of judgment

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 419 § 1 k.p.k.
Art. 420 § 1 k.p.k.
art. 12 k.k

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V KK 83/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 14 marca 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Andrzej Siuchniński w sprawie G. D.skazanego z art. 59 ust.2 Ustawy o przeciwdziałaniu narkomanii w zw. z art. 12 k.k. i innych w związku z oświadczeniem obrońcy skazanego o cofnięciu kasacji wniesionej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]z dnia 26 lipca 2018 r., sygn. akt II AKa […], zmieniającego wyrok Sądu Okręgowego w S.z dnia 6 lutego 2018 r., sygn. akt III K […] postanowił: stwierdzić prawną niedopuszczalność cofnięcia kasacji wywiedzionej przez obrońcę G. D. na jego korzyść.