Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V KK 618/18 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses appeal as obviously groundless for assault conviction where facts were clearly established by lower courts.

Numero d'incarto V KK 618/18
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal as obviously groundless, upholding the lower courts' conviction for assault. The defendant argued against the sentence, but the appellate court found the facts of the assault clearly established and the legal application correct. Consequently, the judgment was confirmed without further review of the merits.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.k.; Art. 386 § 1 k.k.: The Supreme Court may dismiss a cassation appeal as obviously groundless when the lower court's decision is based on clear facts and correct legal reasoning, leaving no room for reasonable doubt regarding the conviction.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation appeal dismissal obviously groundless appeal assault conviction upheld Supreme Court review clearly established facts

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.k.
Art. 386 § 1 k.k.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V KK 618/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 28 listopada 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Eugeniusz Wildowicz (przewodniczący, sprawozdawca)‎SSN Małgorzata Wąsek-Wiaderek‎SSN Włodzimierz WróbelProtokolant Katarzyna Wełpa przy udziale prokuratora Prokuratury Krajowej Grzegorza Krysmanna,‎w sprawie A. P.‎skazanego z art. 286 § 1 kk i in.,‎po rozpoznaniu w Izbie Karnej na rozprawie‎w dniu 28 listopada 2019 r.,‎kasacji wniesionej przez obrońcę skazanego‎od wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w S.‎z dnia 29 marca 2018 r., sygn. akt IV Ka […],‎utrzymującego w mocy wyrok Sądu Rejonowego w S.‎z dnia 25 kwietnia 2017 r., sygn. akt IV K […], I. oddala kasację jako oczywiście bezzasadną, II. obciąża skazanego kosztami postępowania kasacyjnego.