Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
V KK 416/20 Generato dall'IA

Criminal appeal dismissed for one defendant as groundless while another's appeal remains undecided.

Numero d'incarto V KK 416/20
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the defense attorney for defendant E. O., deeming it obviously groundless, while leaving the appeal for defendant J. O. without examination. The court upheld the lower court's conviction for E. O. based on the facts established in the first-instance judgment, whereas no specific grounds were provided for J. O.'s case. Consequently, the legal issue regarding E. O. was resolved in favor of the prosecution, while J. O.'s procedural status remains pending further review.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.; Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.k.: The Supreme Court may dismiss a cassation appeal as obviously groundless if the appeal is based on a violation of the law that is not apparent from the facts of the case or if the appeal is based on a violation of the law that is not apparent from the facts of the case.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation appeal dismissal obviously groundless appeal criminal law violation procedural error review partial cassation decision

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.k.
art. 152 § 2 k.k
O.skazanych z art. 152 § 2 k.k.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V KK 416/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 9 lipca 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Antoni Bojańczyk w sprawie E. O. i J. O.skazanych z art. 152 § 2 k.k. w dniu 9 lipca 2021 r. w Izbie Karnej na posiedzeniu bez udziału stron w przedmiocie kasacji wniesionej przez obrońcę skazanych od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]z dnia 4 grudnia 2019 r., sygn. II AKa […], utrzymującego w mocy wyrok Sądu Okręgowego w G.z dnia 31 maja 2019 r., sygn. II K […], p o s t a n o w i ł: 1. oddalić kasację co do skazanej E. O. jako oczywiście bezzasadną; 2. pozostawić bez rozpoznania kasację co do skazanego J. O.; 3. kosztami sądowymi postępowania kasacyjnego obciążyć skazanych w części ich dotyczących.