Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V KK 297/25 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses criminal appeal as obviously groundless and awards defense attorney fees to the accused. The court rejected the appeal against a conviction for theft, finding no merit in the arguments presented by the defense. Consequently, the appeal was dismissed, and the state was ordered to pay the defense attorney's costs. The decision upholds the lower court's judgment while ensuring the accused is not burdened with litigation expenses. This ruling emphasizes the principle of legal aid and the standard for dismissing appeals without substantive review.

Numero d'incarto V KK 297/25
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal as obviously groundless and ordered the State to pay the defense attorney's fees. The accused, convicted of theft, had appealed a first-instance judgment that upheld a lower court's conviction. The court found the appeal lacked any substantive legal basis and thus rejected it without a full merits review. The decision also exempted the accused from court costs, shifting the financial burden to the State.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.; Art. 385 § 2 k.p.k.: An appeal is dismissed as obviously groundless when it lacks any legal merit, and the State bears the costs of the defense attorney's work in such cases.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
obviously groundless appeal criminal procedure code defense attorney fees state liability costs dismissal without merits legal aid expenses theft conviction appeal

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.k.
Art. 385 § 2 k.p.k.
art. 278 § 1 k.k
skazanego z art. 278 § 1 k.k.
art. 535 § 3 k.p.k
po rozpoznaniu w Izbie Karnej na posiedzeniu w trybie art. 535 § 3 k.p.k.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

V KK 297/25 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 28 sierpnia 2025 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Dariusz Świecki w sprawie P. L. skazanego z art. 278 § 1 k.k. i in. po rozpoznaniu w Izbie Karnej na posiedzeniu w trybie art. 535 § 3 k.p.k. w dniu 28 sierpnia 2025 r., kasacji wniesionej przez obrońcę skazanego od wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w Gdańsku z dnia 22 września 2023 r., sygn. akt V Ka 1102/23, utrzymującego w mocy wyrok Sądu Rejonowego Gdańsk-Północ w Gdańsku z dnia 27 lutego 2023 r., sygn. akt II K 895/20, postanowił: 1. oddalić kasację jako oczywiście bezzasadną; 2. zasądzić od Skarbu Państwa na rzecz adw. A. S. (Kancelaria Adwokacka w G.), jako obrońcy skazanego wyznaczonemu z urzędu, kwotę 885,60 (słownie: osiemset osiemdziesiąt pięć 60/100) złotych, obejmującą już należny VAT, za sporządzenie i wniesienie kasacji w sprawie; 3. zwolnić skazanego od kosztów sądowych postępowania kasacyjnego, obciążając nimi Skarb Państwa. [J.J.][a.ł]