Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
V KK 101/18 Generato dall'IA

Criminal appeal dismissed; court rejects appeal against conviction for tax fraud and other offenses as obviously unfounded.

Numero d'incarto V KK 101/18
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the criminal appeal filed by the defendant against the lower court's conviction for tax fraud and other offenses. The defendant argued for a reversal of the judgment, but the court found the appeal obviously unfounded based on the established facts. Consequently, the original conviction was upheld, and the costs of the cassation proceedings were assigned to the appellant.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.k.; Art. 386 § 1 k.k.: The Supreme Court may dismiss a cassation appeal as obviously unfounded when the lower court's decision is based on clear and undisputed facts, and the appellant fails to present new evidence or legal arguments that could alter the outcome.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation appeal dismissal obviously unfounded appeal tax fraud conviction criminal procedure law costs of proceedings Supreme Court jurisdiction appellant burden of proof

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.k.
Art. 386 § 1 k.k.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V KK 101/18 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 12 marca 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Jarosław Matras (przewodniczący, sprawozdawca)‎SSN Marek Pietruszyński‎SSN Andrzej SiuchnińskiProtokolant Anna Korzeniecka-Plewka przy udziale prokuratora Prokuratury Krajowej Barbary Nowińskiej i przedstawiciela oskarżyciela publicznego […] Urzędu Celno-Skarbowego,‎w sprawie W. T.‎skazanego z art. 107 § 1 kks i in.‎po rozpoznaniu w Izbie Karnej na rozprawie‎w dniu 12 marca 2019 r.,‎kasacji, wniesionej przez obrońcę‎od wyroku Sądu Okręgowego w P.‎z dnia 21 kwietnia 2017 r., sygn. akt XVII Ka […]‎utrzymującego w mocy wyrok Sądu Rejonowego w P.‎z dnia 25 października 2016 r., sygn. akt III K […], oddala kasację jako oczywiście bezzasadną a kosztami sądowymi postępowania kasacyjnego obciąża skazanego.