Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V CSK 81/17 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows unfair competition claim against company for failing to act and protecting personal rights.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 81/17
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court accepted both cassation appeals for further examination regarding a claim for unfair competition and personal rights protection. The plaintiff, a municipality, sued a company for failing to take necessary actions and for infringing personal rights. The court decided to proceed with the case because the lower court's judgment required further review on the merits of the alleged unfair competition and rights violations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Ustawa o ochronie konkurencji i przedsiębiorczości; Kodeks cywilny: When a party fails to act in violation of statutory duties or infringes personal rights, the court must examine the substantive claims if procedural grounds for dismissal are not established.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
unfair competition claim failure to act liability personal rights protection cassation appeal acceptance municipal plaintiff status

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 81/17 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 13 lipca 2017 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Teresa Bielska-Sobkowicz w sprawie z powództwa Gminy W.‎przeciwko "K." Spółce z o.o. w H.‎o zaniechanie czynów nieuczciwej konkurencji i ochronę dóbr osobistych,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 13 lipca 2017 r.,‎na skutek skarg kasacyjnych: Prokuratora Regionalnego we [...] i strony powodowej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we [...]‎z dnia 31 sierpnia 2016 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje obie skargi kasacyjne do rozpoznania.