Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V CSK 603/19 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to establish necessary path for minors' school transport.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 603/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by participants A. S. and M. S. against the Lower Regional Court's refusal to establish a necessary path. The applicants argued that the existing route was unsafe for their children's daily school transport, while the opposing party contended the current arrangement was sufficient. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine if the safety concerns justified a new legal route.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 10 ust. 1 k.r.s.; Art. 10 ust. 2 k.r.s.: The court may establish a necessary path if the existing route poses a significant danger to the safety of persons using it, particularly for minors.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
necessary path school transport minor safety road safety cassation appeal civil procedure public safety

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 10 ust. 1 k.r.s.
Art. 10 ust. 2 k.r.s.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 603/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 21 sierpnia 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Kamil Zaradkiewicz w sprawie z wniosku M. N. i J. N.‎przy uczestnictwie A. S. , M. S. i J. Ż. ‎o ustanowienie drogi koniecznej,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 21 sierpnia 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej uczestników A. S. i M. S. od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w B. ‎z dnia 9 maja 2019 r., sygn. akt II Ca (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE