Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V CSK 6/19 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows cassation appeals in mutual debt claims regarding unpaid sums between individuals.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 6/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Accolto (Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court accepted both cassation appeals filed by the plaintiffs against the appellate court's judgment. The case involved mutual claims for payment between R. C. & T. R. and Z. G., where the lower courts had ruled on the validity of the debts. The court decided to proceed with the review because the appeals raised significant legal questions requiring further examination of the statutory requirements for such claims.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept cassation appeals if the judgment violates statutory provisions or if the facts are unclear, allowing the court to review the mutual debt claims for procedural and substantive errors.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation appeal acceptance mutual debt claims civil procedure law Supreme Court review procedural violation

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 2 k.p.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 6/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 29 października 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Karol Weitz w sprawie z powództwa R. C. i T. R.‎przeciwko Z. G. i U. […] w W.‎o zapłatę, oraz z powództwa wzajemnego Z. G.przeciwko R. C. i T. R.o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 29 października 2019 r.,‎na skutek skarg kasacyjnych powodów (pozwanych wzajemnych) od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]‎z dnia 22 grudnia 2016 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje obie skargi kasacyjne do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE