Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V CSK 433/19 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses plaintiff's request to supplement the judgment due to lack of new relevant facts.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 433/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the plaintiff's request to supplement the judgment dated December 10, 2019. The plaintiff argued that new facts emerged requiring a revision, but the court found no grounds for such an amendment. Consequently, the request was rejected as it did not meet the legal criteria for supplementing a final decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 383 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 383 § 2 k.p.c.: A request to supplement a judgment is admissible only if new facts or circumstances have arisen that could have influenced the outcome, which was not established here.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
supplementing judgment new facts final decision civil procedure Supreme Court dismissal of request procedural amendment

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 383 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 383 § 2 k.p.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 433/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 19 lutego 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marian Kocon w sprawie z powództwa M. S. ‎przeciwko J. F. ‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 19 lutego 2020 r.,‎na skutek wniosku powódki o uzupełnienie postanowienia Sądu Najwyższego z dnia 10 grudnia 2019 r., sygn. akt V CSK 433/19, oddala wniosek. UZASADNIENIE