Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
V CSK 425/20 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine if bank's refusal to pay constitutes unjust enrichment.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 425/20
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the plaintiff against the appellate court's judgment. The plaintiff argued that the bank's refusal to transfer funds constituted unjust enrichment, while the bank contended the funds were lawfully withheld. The court decided to remand the case for further examination to clarify the specific circumstances of the funds' origin and the legal basis for the bank's retention.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 405 k.c.; Art. 406 k.c.: The court established that a cassation appeal regarding unjust enrichment claims is admissible when the lower court failed to examine the essential facts determining the existence of the enrichment without legal basis.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
unjust enrichment cassation appeal bank refusal civil procedure remand for facts

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 405 k.c.
Art. 406 k.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 425/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 30 kwietnia 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Monika Koba w sprawie z powództwa K. K.‎przeciwko (…) Bank (…) S.A. z siedzibą w W. i Spółdzielni Mieszkaniowej Lokatorsko-Własnościowej "[…]." w W.‎o ustalenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 30 kwietnia 2021 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powoda ‎od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 12 marca 2020 r., sygn. akt I ACa (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.