Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V CSK 417/19 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether adverse possession claim is barred by statute of limitations.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 417/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by M. R. K. and W. R. against a lower court's decision denying their adverse possession claim. The applicants argued that the statutory period for adverse possession had expired, while the opposing party contended the claim remained valid based on continuous possession. The court decided to refer the case for further examination to determine if the limitation period was properly calculated.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Ustawa o własnościach wieczystych; Ustawa o ograniczeniach czasowych; The court must examine whether the statutory period for adverse possession has expired before dismissing the claim.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
adverse possession statute of limitations ownership acquisition cassation appeal possession duration

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 417/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 23 stycznia 2020 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marcin Krajewski w sprawie z wniosku M. R. K. i W. R.‎przy uczestnictwie Gminy W.‎o stwierdzenie zasiedzenia,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 23 stycznia 2020 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej wnioskodawców od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w W.‎z dnia 6 marca 2019 r., sygn. akt II Ca (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE