Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V CSK 393/17 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to determine ownership via adverse possession against opposing party's objection.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 393/17
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted the cassation appeal filed by M.G. against the lower court's decision denying ownership via adverse possession. The applicant argued that continuous possession met legal requirements, while the opposing party contested the duration and continuity of the claim. The court decided to remand the case for further examination rather than ruling on the merits immediately.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 100 k.c.; Art. 101 k.c.: The court accepts a cassation appeal regarding adverse possession claims when procedural issues or factual disputes require further clarification before a final judgment on ownership acquisition.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
adverse possession ownership acquisition cassation appeal civil procedure possession duration property rights Supreme Court

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 100 k.c.
Art. 101 k.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 393/17 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 26 stycznia 2018 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Teresa Bielska-Sobkowicz w sprawie z wniosku R. F. i M. G.‎przy uczestnictwie M. C., J. D., J. G., J. S., R. Ż., X. Y., J. K., W. S., A. W., E. S., E. P. i M. S.‎o stwierdzenie nabycia własności nieruchomości przez zasiedzenie,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 26 stycznia 2018 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej wnioskodawcy M.G.od postanowienia Sądu Okręgowego w K.‎z dnia 25 sierpnia 2016 r., sygn. akt IV Ca […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.