Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
V CSK 351/16 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows cassation appeal to examine whether the lower court correctly applied the law in a municipal debt dispute.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 351/16
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court accepted the cassation appeal filed by the defendant against the appellate court's judgment. The dispute concerned a claim for payment by a municipality, with arguments focusing on the correct application of legal provisions regarding debt collection. The court decided to refer the case for further examination rather than dismissing the appeal outright.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal to review whether the lower court correctly applied the law, even if the appeal is not fully admissible for immediate decision.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation appeal acceptance municipal debt claim application of law review civil procedure code Supreme Court jurisdiction

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 351/16 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 21 grudnia 2016 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Mirosław Bączyk w sprawie z powództwa A. I.‎przeciwko Gminie K.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 21 grudnia 2016 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony pozwanej od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w […]z dnia 5 lutego 2016 r., sygn. akt I ACa […], przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania.