Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V CSK 292/17 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows cassation complaints in construction contract dispute regarding payment obligations.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 292/17
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court of Poland accepted both cassation complaints filed by the plaintiff and the intervening party for further review. The dispute involves a construction contract where the plaintiff sought payment from the defendant company, with a third party intervening. The court decided to proceed with the case because the lower court's judgment required clarification on specific legal interpretations regarding the contractual obligations.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.; Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.: The Supreme Court may accept cassation complaints when the lower court's judgment involves a question of law requiring clarification or when the application of the law was incorrect.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
cassation procedure construction contract payment obligations civil litigation third party intervention

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 k.p.c.
Art. 386 § 1 k.p.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 292/17 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 21 listopada 2017 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Władysław Pawlak w sprawie z powództwa W. Firmy Budowlanej Sp. z o.o. we W.‎przeciwko M. Sp. z o.o. Sp. komandytowej we W.‎z udziałem interwenienta ubocznego Przedsiębiorstwa Budowlanego J. Sp. z o.o. we W.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 21 listopada 2017 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej strony powodowej i interwenienta ubocznego od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego we W.‎z dnia 12 lipca 2016 r., sygn. akt I ACa …/16, przyjmuje obie skargi kasacyjne do rozpoznania.