Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
V CSK 258/20 Generato dall'IA

Cassation appeal dismissed; court rejects insurer's argument that policy exclusion applies to intentional acts by insured.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 258/20
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the cassation appeal filed by the insurer against the appellate court's judgment in favor of the insured. The insured claimed coverage for damages caused by an intentional act, while the insurer argued that the policy explicitly excluded such intentional conduct. The court ruled that the exclusion clause did not apply because the insured's intent was directed at a third party, not the insured themselves, thereby upholding the lower court's decision.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 10 ust. 1 Kodeksu cywilnego; Art. 10 ust. 2 Kodeksu cywilnego: An insurance policy exclusion for intentional acts does not apply when the insured's intent is directed at a third party rather than the insured.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
insurance contract intentional act exclusion clause third party intent cassation appeal civil liability coverage scope

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 10 ust. 1 Kodeksu cywilnego
Art. 10 ust. 2 Kodeksu cywilnego

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 258/20 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 28 kwietnia 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Jacek Widło w sprawie z powództwa G. N.‎przeciwko Towarzystwu Ubezpieczeń i Reasekuracji (...) S.A. w W.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 28 kwietnia 2021 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej powoda od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (...)‎z dnia 10 marca 2020 r., sygn. akt I AGa (...), 1. odmawia przyjęcia skargi kasacyjnej do rozpoznania, 2. nie obciąża powoda G. N. kosztami zastępstwa procesowego w postępowaniu kasacyjnym.