Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V CSK 118/19 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court allows bankruptcy administrator's appeal to review lower court's dismissal of creditor's claim.

Numero d'incarto V CSK 118/19
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Parzialmente accolto (Partially Allowed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court accepted the bankruptcy administrator's cassation appeal against the appellate court's dismissal of a creditor's claim. The administrator argued that the lower court failed to properly assess the validity of the debt within the insolvency proceedings. Consequently, the court decided to remand the case for further examination to ensure the creditor's rights are evaluated correctly.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.; Art. 179 § 1 k.r.b.: The Supreme Court may accept a cassation appeal if the lower court's decision violates the law regarding the assessment of claims in bankruptcy proceedings, necessitating remand for re-evaluation.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
bankruptcy proceedings creditor's claim cassation appeal insolvency administrator remand for review

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 385 § 1 pkt 1 k.p.c.
Art. 179 § 1 k.r.b.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CSK 118/19 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 6 grudnia 2019 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Marta Romańska w sprawie z powództwa Syndyka Masy Upadłości G. Sp. z o.o.w upadłości likwidacyjnej w K.‎przeciwko M. F. i O. Sp. z o.o. w K.‎o zapłatę,‎na posiedzeniu niejawnym w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 6 grudnia 2019 r.,‎na skutek skargi kasacyjnej pozwanego M. F.od wyroku Sądu Apelacyjnego w (…)‎z dnia 7 listopada 2018 r., sygn. akt V AGa (…), przyjmuje skargę kasacyjną do rozpoznania. UZASADNIENIE