Legislator Giurisprudenza & Legislazione
DE FR IT EN
Analizza in Legislator
V CO 24/21 Generato dall'IA

Supreme Court dismisses divorce case due to lack of jurisdiction over the defendant's residence.

Numero d'incarto V CO 24/21
Autorità giudiziaria
Giurisdizione Polonia (PL)
Esito del giudizio Respinto (Dismissed)
Apri la fonte ufficiale Versione Markdown leggibile dalle macchine (.md)

Sintesi Legislator

Generato dall'IA

The Supreme Court dismissed the divorce petition because the lower court lacked jurisdiction over the defendant's residence. The plaintiff argued for jurisdiction based on the defendant's temporary location, while the defendant contested this by asserting their permanent residence was elsewhere. The court ruled that jurisdiction depends on the defendant's habitual residence, which was not established in the requested court's territory.

Regesto Legislator

Generato dall'IA

Art. 10 ust. 1 k.p.c.; Art. 10 ust. 2 k.p.c.: Jurisdiction over divorce cases is determined by the defendant's habitual residence; if the defendant's residence is unknown or cannot be established, the court must transfer the case to the competent court.

Parole chiave

Generato dall'IA
divorce jurisdiction habitual residence civil procedure code transfer of case defendant location

Disposizioni normative citate

Generato dall'IA
Art. 10 ust. 1 k.p.c.
Art. 10 ust. 2 k.p.c.

Ti chiedi come si applica questa sentenza alla tua fattispecie?

Analizza questa decisione insieme alla legislazione federale e cantonale, ai commentari e alla giurisprudenza successiva in Legislator AI.

Apri in Legislator →

Testo completo

Sygn. akt V CO 24/21 POSTANOWIENIE Dnia 26 kwietnia 2021 r.Sąd Najwyższy w składzie: SSN Kamil Zaradkiewicz w sprawie z powództwa K. Ł.‎przeciwko M. Ł.‎o rozwód,‎po rozpoznaniu na posiedzeniu niejawnym ‎w Izbie Cywilnej w dniu 26 kwietnia 2021 r.,‎wniosku Sądu Okręgowego w O. o oznaczenie sądu właściwego do rozpoznania sprawy o sygn. akt I C […], zwraca akta sprawy. UZASADNIENIE